Which method should I use for integrating (x^2+x)^-1?

In summary, the conversation revolves around solving the integral \int \frac{1}{x^2+x}dx using different methods such as integration by parts, partial fractions, and trigonometric substitutions. The experts suggest using partial fractions and explain how it is a commonly used method in elementary algebra and calculus. They also mention that the solution involves the arctanh function and the natural logarithm function.
  • #1
TylerH
729
0
I'm learning integration by parts, and thought this would be a good test of my understanding.

I've separated it into something that seems better.
[tex]\int \frac{1}{x^2+x}dx = \int \frac{1}{x} \frac{1}{x+1}dx[/tex]

I'm guessing I use integration by parts from here, but which should I make u?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Have you thought about completing the square and then using a trigonometric substitution:

ie x^2 + x + 1/4 - 1/4 = (x + 1/2)^2 - (1/2)^2
 
  • #3
Partial fractions would be a good approach.

[tex]{1\over x(x+1)} = {1\over x} - {1\over x+1}[/tex]
 
  • #4
chiro: That was how Wolfram Alpha did it. It was the hyperbolic tangent that scared me away. :)

PhDorBust: That's awesome. Directly to the solution, too. Could you explain how you spotted that?
 
  • #5
^Partial fractions is a standard method that used to be learned in elementary algebra. Now it has been pushed into elementary calculus elementary ordinary differential equations or e, usually in chapters with names like "more integrals yay!" and "Laplace transforms woo!" respectively.
 
  • #6
And I thought I hated U substitution...
 
  • #7
Well, I suggest you do the integral through both methods and compare the results. You'll get an expression for the arctanh in terms of the natural logarithm function which is somewhat expected, since the tanh is defined in terms of the exponential in base <e>.
 

FAQ: Which method should I use for integrating (x^2+x)^-1?

What is the general process for integrating (x^2+x)^-1?

The general process for integrating (x^2+x)^-1 is to recognize it as a rational function and use the power rule for integration. This involves breaking the expression into simpler parts, finding the antiderivative for each part, and then using the sum rule to combine them into a single solution.

How do you handle the negative exponent in (x^2+x)^-1 when integrating?

To handle the negative exponent in (x^2+x)^-1, you can rewrite the expression as (1/x^2+x^-1) and then use the power rule for integration. Alternatively, you can use the substitution method by letting u = x^2+x and then rewriting the expression as u^-1 before integrating.

3. Can the constant of integration be omitted when integrating (x^2+x)^-1?

No, the constant of integration cannot be omitted when integrating (x^2+x)^-1. This is because the antiderivative of a rational function always includes a constant term, which is necessary to account for all possible solutions.

4. Is there a specific range of values for x when integrating (x^2+x)^-1?

Yes, there is a specific range of values for x when integrating (x^2+x)^-1. Since the expression contains a negative exponent, it is only defined for values of x that are not equal to zero. This means that the range of integration is all real numbers except for zero.

5. Can integration by parts be used to integrate (x^2+x)^-1?

No, integration by parts cannot be used to integrate (x^2+x)^-1. This method is typically used for integrating products of functions, and (x^2+x)^-1 is not a product. Instead, you can use the power rule or substitution method to integrate this expression.

Similar threads

Back
Top