Which of the following implications are right?

  • MHB
  • Thread starter evinda
  • Start date
In summary: Therefore $r = 0$ which is false.Therefore our assumption that $r \neq 0$ must be false, and so:$a^n|b \Rightarrow a|b$.In summary, we discussed the implications $a|b^{n} \Rightarrow a|b$, $a^n|b^n \Rightarrow a|b$, $a^n|b \Rightarrow a|b$, and $a^3|b^3 \Rightarrow a|b$. We determined that the first two are true, and the last two are false. We provided a counterexample for the first and showed a proof for the second. For the third and fourth, we used the Fundamental theorem of arithmetic to show their validity. Additionally
  • #1
evinda
Gold Member
MHB
3,836
0
Hi! :)
Which of the following implications are right?
  • $a|b^{n} \Rightarrow a|b$
  • $a^n|b^n \Rightarrow a|b$
  • $a^n|b \Rightarrow a|b$
  • $a^3|b^3 \Rightarrow a|b$
Prove the right ones and give a counterexample for the wrong ones.

That's what I think..
  • Wrong.Counterexample: $ 20|10^2 \nRightarrow 20|10$
  • Wrong,because $a^n|b^n \Rightarrow b^n=ka^n=(k \cdot a^{n-1}) \cdot a \Rightarrow a|b^n$,and from the first sentence it is wrong..But I have not found a counterexample! :confused:
  • It is true because $a^n|b \Rightarrow b=ka^n=(k \cdot a^{n-1}) \cdot a \Rightarrow a|b$
  • I think it is true,but I don't know how to prove it :eek:

Is that what I have tried so far right? (Thinking)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
1. Is false, as you have shown.

2. Is true. Try assuming $b \neq 0 \pmod{a}$ and arrive at contradiction.

3. Is true. Reasoning is okay.

4. A special case of 2.
 
Last edited:
  • #3
mathbalarka said:
4. A special case of 1.

Erm... of 2?
 
  • #4
Ya, 2.
 
  • #5
mathbalarka said:
1. Is false, as you have shown.

2. Is true. Try assuming $b \neq 0 \pmod{a}$ and arrive at contradiction.

3. Is true. Reasoning is okay.

4. A special case of 2.

2. Do you mean that $a \nmid b$ means that $b=q \cdot a+r (*)$
Since $a^n|b^n \Rightarrow b^n=ka^n$ ..Do I have to replace the relation (*) to show it?? :confused:

3.Could I also show it in an other way?
 
  • #6
evinda said:
2. Do you mean that $a \nmid b$ means that $b=q \cdot a+r (*)$
Since $a^n|b^n \Rightarrow b^n=ka^n$ ..Do I have to replace the relation (*) to show it?? :confused:

I do not know what mathbalarka intended, but here's another way.

According to the Fundamental theorem of arithmetic every number has a unique prime factorization.
So suppose $a \nmid b$, then $a$ must contain a power of a prime factor that is not in $b$.
In that case $a^n$ will also have a power of a prime factor that is not in $b^n$, which is a contradiction.
3.Could I also show it in an other way?

Your method is fine.
Another way is by using the Fundamental theorem of arithmetic again.

$a^n|b$ implies that $a^n$ contains only prime powers that are also in $b$.
But then $a$ can also only contain prime powers that are also in $b$.
Therefore $a^n|b \Rightarrow a|b$.
 
  • #7
Yes, if $b \neq 0$ (mod $a$) this means:

$b = qa + r$ for some $0 < r < a$.

Since $a^n|b$ we have:

$b = ka^n = qa + r$.

Thus:

$ka^n - qa = r$, which is to say that:

$a(ka^{n-1} - q) = r$.

Since $a$ divides the left, $a$ divides the right, that is: $a|r$.

But $r < a$ and $r \neq 0$...how can this be?

For if $at = r$ for some integer $t$, we have:

$0 < r = at < a \implies 0 < t < 1$.

But there is no non-zero integer between 0 and 1.
 

FAQ: Which of the following implications are right?

What do you mean by "implications"?

"Implications" refers to the logical consequences or results that can be drawn from a particular statement or situation.

How can I determine which implication is correct?

To determine which implication is correct, you will need to carefully analyze the statement or situation and consider all possible outcomes. It may also be helpful to consult with other experts in the field.

Are there any methods or tools that can assist in identifying the correct implications?

Yes, there are various methods and tools that can help in identifying the correct implications. These may include logic models, decision trees, and statistical analysis.

Can implications be subjective or are they always objective?

Implications can be both subjective and objective. While some implications may be based on factual evidence and therefore considered objective, others may be influenced by personal opinions and perspectives, making them subjective.

Are there any potential risks or limitations in relying on implications to make decisions?

Yes, there can be potential risks and limitations in relying solely on implications to make decisions. It is important to consider all available information and factors before making a decision, as implications may not always be accurate or complete.

Similar threads

Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
938
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
946
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top