Which road to Special and General Relativity, and beyond?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on recommendations for studying Special and General Relativity and string theory, emphasizing the importance of a strong mathematical foundation. The user is currently reading advanced mathematics texts, including Calculus by M. Spivak and Linear Algebra Done Right by S. Axler. Suggested next steps include studying "Analysis on Manifolds" by Munkres and "Ordinary Differential Equations" by V. Arnold, both of which align with the user's current level. Additionally, "Spacetime Physics" is recommended as an accessible introduction to Special Relativity. Building a solid understanding of mathematics is deemed essential before delving into General Relativity.
madsmh
Messages
32
Reaction score
2
Hello, I am studying mathematics and physics on my own. However, it is the mathematical side of physics that interest me.

I would like some recommendations on which books would be beneficial for me to read, to gain an understanding of Special and General Relativity, and ultimatly string theory.

I am currently reading Calculus by M. Spivak, and Linear Algebra Done Right, by S. Axler.
If anyone could suggest books to read after I'm done with these, I would be greateful.

.. Mads
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Those are very good books. Two books I'd suggest that cover Multi-variable calculus and ODE at the level of Axler and Spivak (read high) are:

Analysis on Manifolds - Munkres
Ordinary Differential Equations - V. Arnold (note I'd get the "new" edition as it covers the standard solution methods as well as the dynamical systems stuff)

Both books are difficult but not harder then Spivak or Axler in my opinion.

I think it might be best to cover a little more math and physics before tackling General Relavity but Special Relativity is a very accessible subject. I's suggest "Spacetime Physics" its a good introduction but I'd say its the easiest book I've recommended.
 
Hi Deluks, thank you very much for your suggestions! The books you suggested does indeed seem excellent.

.. Mads
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top