Who ever said kids don't read enough these days?

  • Thread starter G01
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Kids
In summary: I don't remember, and I got to pick the color for my bedroom. I got to pick "dark green" and I loved it. Then, when I was 11, my parents bought a little bungalow, and I got to pick the color for my bedroom. I got to pick "light green".I'm in the middle of the Dark Materials Trilogy myself. I'm really enjoying it. Can't believe I didn't read it before this.
  • #1
G01
Homework Helper
Gold Member
2,704
19
People need to encourage their kids to read more. This is ridiculous. Whether you're a fan or not, by the time you're a teenager you should have at least heard of the Narnia books. Check my signature for the quote:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Well, I can't see your sig, so...
 
  • #3
I HATED reading as a kid. I would rather have done anything else -All the way up until high school.
 
  • #4
yea i hated reading to .the only thing i read was dads girly mags .i was spanked when i got caught. now i don't read any thing unless its on the computer .
 
  • #5
People need to encourage their kids to read more. This is ridiculous. Whether you're a fan or not, by the time you're a teenager you should have at least heard of the Narnia books.

Why? I don't think there's anything really special about the Narnia books. I didn't like the Narnia books when I read it. Loved the Dark Materials trilogy though.
 
Last edited:
  • #6
i hadn't heard of any of c.s. lewis's trash by the time i was a teenager but i had read all of dostoevsky's books
 
  • #7
G01 said:
Whether your a fan of C.S. Lewis or not, you have to admit that the quote that is now my signature has to be one of the biggest insults to 20th century literature that has ever been uttered. People need to encourage their kids to read more. This is ridiculous. Whether you're a fan or not, by the time you're a teenager you should have at least heard of the Narnia books.

Well, on the surface it does look pretty bad, but give the kid some credit. Maybe he's just not well-versed in Lewis and other authors of that genre. When I was a kid I read a lot, but almost every book I read was about physics, biology, or astronomy. In retrospect I wish I'd read C.S. Lewis (the upside is that I get to read all his books for the first time...when I get arund to it). But to be fair, I as a highly literate ten year old would have had no idea who C.S. Lewis is.
 
  • #8
ice109 said:
i hadn't heard of any of c.s. lewis's trash by the time i was a teenager but i had read all of dostoevsky's books
Similar here. I didn't read all of Dostoevsky, but I did read 'Crime and Punishment', 'The Idiot', and 'The Brothers Karamazov' as a teenager and never heard of Narnia until I was in my 50s when the movie came out. I can't say if Lewis' writing is trash though as I have not read any of his books.
 
  • #9
it's christian propaganda
 
  • #10
arunma said:
Well, on the surface it does look pretty bad, but give the kid some credit. Maybe he's just not well-versed in Lewis and other authors of that genre. When I was a kid I read a lot, but almost every book I read was about physics, biology, or astronomy. In retrospect I wish I'd read C.S. Lewis (the upside is that I get to read all his books for the first time...when I get arund to it). But to be fair, I as a highly literate ten year old would have had no idea who C.S. Lewis is.

O.K. This is a good point, but still. Who assumes that the book's are made from movies? Or that they are written together? Does that ever happen? As far as I see it, this kid should at least have the common sense to see that the book is usually made before the movie.
 
  • #11
siddharth said:
Why? I don't think there's anything really special about the Narnia books. I didn't like the Narnia books when I read it. Loved the Dark Materials trilogy though.

I'm in the middle of the Dark Materials Trilogy myself. I'm really enjoying it. Can't believe I didn't read it before this. I don't think the movie did the first book justice though.
 
  • #12
jimmysnyder said:
Similar here. I didn't read all of Dostoevsky, but I did read 'Crime and Punishment', 'The Idiot', and 'The Brothers Karamazov' as a teenager and never heard of Narnia until I was in my 50s when the movie came out. I can't say if Lewis' writing is trash though as I have not read any of his books.

I think Lewis is a good writer, but his books are definitely Christian allegory. So, if that bothers you, you may not enjoy the books. When I did read the books, I didn't think the allegory would be something children could pick up on. I think I didn't see the allegory until I reread them as an adult.
 
  • #13
I loved to read as a kid, and when I was 10, my parents bought a big old ramshackle place from a widower. A walk-in closet just big enough to hold a dresser and a bed became my bedroom, and that closet had a little alcove that wrapped over the stair-well, and it was full of books. Not just any books, but classics by Dickens, Twain, Verne, Hawthorn, Melville, etc. The books came from some kind of "classic" book club and were bound similarly. It took me years to get through them all.
 
  • #14
As in the books chalk full of Christian symbolism and apologetics? You might as well stuff Mere Christianity in their face. :-p

Thank goodness for His Dark Materials, no propaganda there, except analogies and symbolism with the Magisterium, the rejection of religion by the characters and the killing of the The Authority's Regent, and the Authority himself.
 
  • #15
G01 said:
O.K. This is a good point, but still. Who assumes that the book's are made from movies? Or that they are written together? Does that ever happen? As far as I see it, this kid should at least have the common sense to see that the book is usually made before the movie.

Well...again just to be fair, sometimes books do come out alongside movies. They did it with a few of the recent Star Trek movies. And often times, many movies will also have a novelization that comes out along with the film. For whatever reason I've had "The Cable Guy" in my bookshelf (haven't read it, don't plan to) for over ten years. Can't remember where/why I got it...

G01 said:
I think Lewis is a good writer, but his books are definitely Christian allegory. So, if that bothers you, you may not enjoy the books. When I did read the books, I didn't think the allegory would be something children could pick up on. I think I didn't see the allegory until I reread them as an adult.

Same here. I remember one summer after first grade, I was in a summer school, and they showed us the cartoon version of The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe. I didn't pick up the Biblical allusions either. Granted, at the time I hadn't read the Bible (I don't think I even knew what it was), so this isn't surprising. But it was funny when a couple years ago I saw the film and immediately had an "oh yeah!" moment.
 
  • #16
Moridin said:
Thank goodness for His Dark Materials, no propaganda there, except analogies and symbolism with the Magisterium, the rejection of religion by the characters and the killing of the The Authority's Regent, and the Authority himself.

Well, I'm not sure about that. I'd say that this series of books is essentially atheist propaganda. Of course now we're getting into the issue of whether we should be using the term "propaganda" in the perjorative sense of the word. Is there really anything wrong with propagating one's worldview by means of allegory?
 
  • #17
arunma said:
Well, I'm not sure about that. I'd say that this series of books is essentially atheist propaganda. Of course now we're getting into the issue of whether we should be using the term "propaganda" in the perjorative sense of the word. Is there really anything wrong with propagating one's worldview by means of allegory?

Note that I was trying to be sarcastic. It is obvious that the series have some critique of religion embedded in them. I am all for propagating one's world view in one's writing.
 
  • #18
"The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe" was one of my favorite books as a child. And you're right G01, it's just a story to a child, unless they are intentionally told there is some hidden meaning, they aren't going to think of it as anything more than a story.
 
  • #19
I never liked reading. Still don't. The only times I read actual books are when I am on an airplane and when it's for a class. I do enjoy it most of the time, but it's not something I would do in my free time.
 
  • #20
Evo said:
"The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe" was one of my favorite books as a child. And you're right G01, it's just a story to a child, unless they are intentionally told there is some hidden meaning, they aren't going to think of it as anything more than a story.
I loved the story but did not know it was an allegory until adulthood. Big deal. So is The Matrix.
 
  • #21
DaveC426913 said:
I loved the story but did not know it was an allegory until adulthood. Big deal. So is The Matrix.

Yeah...except the Matrix had to have crappy sequels.
 
  • #22
arunma said:
Yeah...except the Matrix had to have crappy sequels.

Hollywood is all about commercialisation, they had to cash in on this gold mine.
 
  • #23
Evo said:
"The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe" was one of my favorite books as a child. And you're right G01, it's just a story to a child, unless they are intentionally told there is some hidden meaning, they aren't going to think of it as anything more than a story.

Lewis' stories stand by their own, irrespective the Christian allusions in it, apart from the final book. (Not Magician's Nephew, but "The Last stand" or something).

Pullman's trilogy becomes rather a rant in the 3rd volume, the first two are quite good.
 
  • #24
i lost interest in reading after i was forced to go through a literary text for literature.
 
  • #25
Oerg said:
... i was forced to go through a literary text for literature.
What does this mean?
 
  • #26
DaveC426913 said:
What does this mean?

I'm not sure, but I think he was saying that he hated reading ever since he was forced to read in school.
 
  • #27
First, I've always loved reading and by the second grade, was reading at a 12th grade level, so don't be labeling kids. Second, I once started a Narnia book, but ended up being bored with it, which is quite a rare relationship between me and a book (except for the Silmariliion, especially considering I trudged through "Prince and the Pauper" as a 3rd grader. Third, don't bash the Dark Materials books, there well-written and have a good storyline. They weren't even controversial until the movie came out.
 
  • #28
We should start a "good books that you may not have read, thread". Until that time, another bunch of books that are really good, but may be controversial if made into a movie are those by Garth Nix. Can't remember the series name, but they're all good.
 
  • #29
It troubles me that so many people nowadays are "bored" with reading. I think kids today are spoiled by DVD's and the internet. I read voraciously as a child. It's fast becoming a lost art, in favor of digital media- it's shame, because it detracts from our imagination and ability to reason, interpret, and be creative. Yes CS Lewis is an allegory, and so is the Golden compass trilogy, LOTR, and every other classic fantasy series. That doesn't mean it doesn't provide entertainment. Politcal agendas are unimportant to a young child seeking adventures of the mind, and I as I recall, the magical places Lewis Tolkein and others took me as a child make any subtle agendas not worth mentioning. I'm sure some may disagree, but I think reading forces us to think instead of handing us our thoughts on a screen or a monitor.

Books are the doors of the mind. But enough about my soapbox...
 
  • #30
Lewis Tolkien? Last time I checked it was John Ronald Reuel Tolkien, and last time I checked, people that have been dead 30+ years don't change their name to Lewis. LOL just givin you a hard time, but yeah I find it amazing how many of my peers can't or don't read, even kids in my gifted classes!
 
  • #31
I've never heard of any of the books mentionned.
 
  • #32
I think one of the problems is that not enough parents take the time anymore to read good books to their children. I'm not talking about a 5 minute Dr Seuss book, but reading something with a good story and characters. My mother read The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe to me when I was 4-5 years old. If as a parent you don't get your kids interested in more in depth books by reading them to them when they are little, many will not know how enjoyable they are and want to continue. If all you read to your children are fluffy litttle stories (although I love Dr Seuss type books) once the child is old enough to read on their own, these stories are too simple and they will be less likely to seek out more complex books.

I wholeheartedly agree with Zantra, there is no substitute for the creative thinking that reading develops in young children. Too many parents would rather pop in a DVD and let someone else do their children's imagining for them. This ties into the recent research that has shown that children that are brainfed with audio and visual CD's & DVD's (like Baby Einstein) have smaller vocabularies than children that are not subjected to them. The lack of human interaction at such a young age is probably the culprit. A baby can't interact with a CD.
 
  • #33
Zantra said:
It troubles me that so many people nowadays are "bored" with reading... I'm sure some may disagree, but I think reading forces us to think instead of handing us our thoughts on a screen or a monitor.

Books are the doors of the mind. But enough about my soapbox...


ooops duplicated - see post below
 
Last edited:
  • #34
Zantra said:
It troubles me that so many people nowadays are "bored" with reading... I'm sure some may disagree, but I think reading forces us to think instead of handing us our thoughts on a screen or a monitor.

Books are the doors of the mind. But enough about my soapbox...


I was never interested in reading as a child - the only books I read were the ones that were compulsory at school - but I rarely finished them either...consequently I failed English.

But when it comes to radical thinking I rate high and I attribute this largely to not having been influenced too much by other peoples ideas and imaginations.

I think if a child is not interested in reading (and no physical/physiological reason is found s.a. dyslexia, illiteracy) then there should be no pressure on that child to read - they will find there own means of enrichment.

But when it comes to research: books/the written word are indispensible.
 
  • #35
I was a voracious reader as a child. Mom would read to me and soon I was finding my own books to read myself. From high school through my time in the military I read a book, of my own accord, every month or two. I slowed down after leaving the military just because I was very busy with work and school. Then I got my computer and I rarely read anything. Ironically, the last book I read was The Screwtape Letters by C.S. Lewis about half a year ago.

I have the feeling that libraries will be knocked down and turned into Walmarts and parking lots.
 
Back
Top