Why Are BJTs Considered Cheaper to Operate Than FETs?

  • Thread starter iScience
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Bjt Fet
In summary, the conversation discusses the comparison between BJTs and FETs in terms of cost of operation. While some argue that FETs may be cheaper due to their lower current requirements, others point out that the choice of transistor depends on the specific circuit design and application. Therefore, it is not accurate to make a generalization about the cost of operating BJTs versus FETs.
  • #1
iScience
466
5
why are people saying BJTs are cheaper to OPERATE?

the field effect devices require less current and should therefore cost less no?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
what people ? where ?

any links to that ?

Dave
 
  • #3
The original statement is a lot like saying "Fords get better gas mileage than Chevys", without any other information provided. You can't make this type of comparison without talking about the type of circuit (the application), the type of BJT & FETs involved, and possibly several other things, so the statement itself has no merit.

Circuit design dictates transistor choice, and in some cases, BJTs may be the preferred transistor, while in others, FETs are a much better option (for any number of reasons but not usually "operating cost").
 
  • #4
As others have said, you can not generalize. There are certain applications where BJTs are better while others where FETs are better. You have to talk about specifics of the application. And add into JFETs vs. MOSFETs vs. BJTs in analog circuits generally.
 
  • #5


There are several factors that contribute to the perception that BJTs are cheaper to operate compared to FETs. One major factor is the manufacturing process. BJTs can be fabricated using simpler processes and materials, leading to lower production costs. Additionally, BJTs have a lower voltage drop and can operate at higher currents, making them more efficient and cost-effective in high-power applications.

Another factor is the market demand and availability. BJTs have been in use for a longer time and are more widely used in various electronic devices, resulting in a larger market and lower costs. On the other hand, FETs are relatively newer and have a smaller market, making them more expensive.

Furthermore, BJTs have a simpler structure and require fewer components, making them easier and cheaper to assemble and maintain. FETs, on the other hand, have a more complex structure and require more precise manufacturing techniques, leading to higher operational costs.

In conclusion, while FETs may require less current to operate, there are various factors that contribute to the perception that BJTs are cheaper to operate. However, it is important to consider the specific application and requirements when determining the most cost-effective option for a particular project.
 

Related to Why Are BJTs Considered Cheaper to Operate Than FETs?

1. What is the main difference between BJT and FET in terms of operational costs?

The main difference between BJT and FET in terms of operational costs is that BJT (Bipolar Junction Transistor) has a higher power dissipation and requires more power to operate compared to FET (Field Effect Transistor). This results in higher operational costs for BJT.

2. Are there any other factors besides power dissipation that affect the operational costs of BJT and FET?

Yes, besides power dissipation, other factors that can affect the operational costs of BJT and FET include the type of application, operating frequency, and the size of the device. These factors can impact the efficiency and performance of the transistors, thus affecting their operational costs.

3. Which transistor, BJT or FET, has a longer lifespan and therefore lower long-term operational costs?

In general, FET has a longer lifespan compared to BJT, resulting in lower long-term operational costs. This is because FET has no physical contact between its input and output terminals, reducing wear and tear over time.

4. Is there a significant price difference between BJT and FET in terms of initial investment?

Yes, there is a significant price difference between BJT and FET in terms of initial investment. BJT is typically less expensive compared to FET. However, as mentioned before, FET has a longer lifespan, resulting in lower long-term operational costs, making it a more cost-effective option in the long run.

5. Are there any applications where BJT is more cost-effective than FET?

Yes, there are certain applications where BJT may be more cost-effective than FET. BJT is known for its high current and power handling capabilities, making it a better choice for high-power applications. Additionally, BJT is typically more affordable and readily available, making it a suitable choice for certain low-cost applications.

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
73
Views
8K
Replies
5
Views
13K
Back
Top