Why Are Burnup Numbers Identical for Different Fuels in MCNP?

In summary, the identical burnup numbers for different fuels in MCNP (Monte Carlo N-Particle Transport Code) can be attributed to the intrinsic properties of the neutron interactions and decay processes within the simulation framework. The code calculates burnup based on the same underlying physics principles, leading to consistent results across varying fuel types, despite their distinct compositions and characteristics. This phenomenon highlights the importance of understanding the specific computational methods and assumptions used in MCNP for accurate interpretations of burnup calculations.
  • #1
Rafimah
14
1
TL;DR Summary
Different fuels are giving the same burnup in MCNP
Hi everyone,

I'm trying to compare 3 different fuels and MCNP and I want to recover the burnup of each. When I do that however, I get identical numbers for burnup, which doesn't make sense to me, as they have different materials (LEU vs LEU+ vs a thorium-based fuel).

Does anyone know what could be the issue here? My understanding is that burnup is the energy reduced per unit mass of isotopes >=90, so it should be pretty different for these 3 cases. I uploaded the 3 out files.

Thanks!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
Hi @Rafimah , I can't see the out files.
 
  • Like
Likes rpp
  • #3
I don't see your output files, but I think you have a conceptualization problem. For burnup calculations, ther burnup is an input (usually specified as energy per mass of heavy metal), and the code will calculate the isotopic distribution and k-effective.

It sounds like you ran three cases and received the same burnup. Not surprising, since this is an input. Look at the isotopics and k-effective, and they should be different.
 
  • Like
Likes Alex A
  • #4
There is a BURN card in the other thread specified as a power level and number of days to burn for but the reactor isn't finished and has a k of around 0.01, it's actually so under critical the code won't run. I think comparing fuels with BURN is valid, but if the conversion ratio is low any fuel is just going to yield the strictly theoretical amount of time and energy.
 
  • Like
Likes rpp

FAQ: Why Are Burnup Numbers Identical for Different Fuels in MCNP?

1. What are burnup numbers in the context of MCNP simulations?

Burnup numbers refer to the measure of how much energy has been extracted from nuclear fuel over time, typically expressed in gigawatt-days per metric ton of fuel (GWd/MTU). In MCNP (Monte Carlo N-Particle Transport Code) simulations, burnup is used to evaluate the depletion of nuclear fuel and the production of fission products and actinides during reactor operation.

2. Why do burnup numbers appear identical for different fuels in MCNP?

Burnup numbers may appear identical for different fuels in MCNP due to the specific parameters and assumptions made during the simulation. For example, if the same operational conditions, neutron flux, and fuel cycle length are applied, the burnup calculations can yield similar results across different fuel types, even though their compositions and behaviors may differ under real-world conditions.

3. How does fuel composition affect burnup in MCNP simulations?

Fuel composition significantly affects the burnup process, as different isotopes have varying fission probabilities, neutron capture cross-sections, and decay pathways. However, when using MCNP, if the model does not adequately account for these differences or if the simulation is set up to focus on specific parameters that overshadow these differences, the resulting burnup numbers may appear similar even for distinct fuel types.

4. Can the identical burnup numbers lead to misleading conclusions?

Yes, identical burnup numbers can lead to misleading conclusions if one assumes that different fuels behave the same way in a reactor environment. It is essential to consider other factors such as isotopic composition, thermal and fast neutron behavior, and the presence of fission products, which can significantly influence reactor performance and safety.

5. What should be considered when interpreting burnup results from MCNP?

When interpreting burnup results from MCNP, it is crucial to consider the assumptions and parameters used in the simulation, the physical properties of the fuels being compared, and the specific conditions of the reactor environment. Additionally, understanding the limitations of the MCNP model and the potential for simplifications that may not reflect real-world scenarios is essential for accurate analysis.

Back
Top