- #36
BobG
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
- 352
- 88
TheStatutoryApe said:I used to work at a coffee house. Almost all of the nonchain coffeehouses in the area have gone under or changed hands about once a year for most of the last decade. Even when I worked at the coffee house I had people that would come in and order in starbucks lingo or ask for starbucks specialty drinks. Occasionally I had people come in just to ask me where the nearest starbucks was. Kinda irked me so I just said "Drive down the street, any direction, and you'll find one eventually."
Border's and B&N all have coffee houses in them now. Seattle's Best at Borders I think and Starbucks at B&N. B&N especially have become hangouts with book club meetings, chess clubs, go clubs, and even just certain groups of friends that hang out there. When I was in high school, even though we had a coffee house right across the street from the school that quite a few of us hung out at, the students as a whole voted the B&N starbucks a few blocks away as most popular hangout.
An article about why Starbucks actually helps mom and pop coffeehouses. Mind you, that's not the whole story. Starbucks wipes out competing coffee houses in other ways, such as buying the lease from the building owner so the competing coffee house has no place to do business from.
All in all, Starbucks has improved conditions for coffee houses in general. Twenty years ago, how many people would have paid Starbucks kind of prices for coffee drinks? The profit margin on coffee drinks is incredible, although you still obviously need to sell enough coffee to pay the rent (i.e. - having customers spend a lot of time browsing books hurts your coffee profits even though it increases your book profits).
There is a new push at Starbucks where they're trying out dropping the Starbucks name on some of their shops; going for a more local flavor instead. I think that suggests the locals aren't doing so bad in their competition against Starbucks (provided they can keep their lease).
In any event, a book store/coffee shop is more like the Borders/B&N model. You could put a Starbucks, a Borders, and a used book store/coffee shop all right next to each other and none would be drawing quite the same customers. The quick grab a coffee and go customers would hit the Starbucks while customers with a little more time could hit one of the book shops (and the Starbucks would still pull in the biggest profits). I don't think a customer would linger in a Borders and a used book store in the same trip, but I wonder if it would create an environment where some of the trips would be to the used book store instead. It could even create a strange partnership where a pseudo-Starbucks under a different name would be glad to share adjacent space with a local independent book store.