Why can we only change the wavenumber?

This is because the circular frequency $\omega$ is determined by the product $kx- \sqrt{a} t$, so changing the value of $k$ only affects the shape of the wave, not its velocity. In summary, the solutions $u_1$ and $u_2$ have the same velocity $\sqrt{a}$ even though their wave numbers $k_1$ and $k_2$ are different, because the circular frequency $\omega$ is determined by the product $kx- \sqrt{a} t$, not just the value of $k$.
  • #1
evinda
Gold Member
MHB
3,836
0
Hello! (Wave)

Wave equation: $u_{tt}=au_{xx}, a>0$

We are looking for solutions of the wave equation of the form of a wave function.

We suppose that $u(x,t)=A \cos(kx- \omega t)$ is a solution of $u_{tt}=au_{xx}, a>0$.

We have:

$$u_x(x,t)=-Ak \sin(kx- \omega t)\\u_{xx}(x,t)=-Ak^2 \cos(kx-\omega t)\\u_t(x,t)=-\omega A \sin(kx- \omega t)\\ u_{tt}(x,t)=-\omega^2 A \cos(kx-\omega t)$$

Thus, it has to hold that:

$$-A \omega^2 \cos(kx-\omega t)=-a A k^2 \cos(kx \omega t)$$

or equivalently

$$A(\omega^2-ak^2) \cos(kx-\omega t)=0 (\forall x,t \in \mathbb{R})$$

The above holds if $\omega^2=ak^2$.

Thus $u(x,t)=Acos(k(x- \sqrt{a}t))$ is a solution of the wave equation of the form of a wave funcion, where $k>0$.Remark:

At the above example we see that, if $k_1, k_2>0$ wave numbers with $k_1 \neq k_2$ then we have solutions of the form of a wavefunction$$u_1(x,t)=A \cos(k_1(x- \sqrt{a}t))$$$$u_2(x,t)=A \cos(k_2(x- \sqrt{a}t))$$

that "travel" with the same velocity $\sqrt{a}$.Could you explain me why we can just change the wavenumber but let the circular frequencyas it is?
I.e. why can we write the following? (Thinking)$$u_1(x,t)=A \cos(k_1(x- \sqrt{a}t))$$$$u_2(x,t)=A \cos(k_2(x- \sqrt{a}t))$$
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
evinda said:
Hello! (Wave)

Wave equation: $u_{tt}=au_{xx}, a>0$

We are looking for solutions of the wave equation of the form of a wave function.

We suppose that $u(x,t)=A \cos(kx- \omega t)$ is a solution of $u_{tt}=au_{xx}, a>0$.

We have:

$$u_x(x,t)=-Ak \sin(kx- \omega t)\\u_{xx}(x,t)=-Ak^2 \cos(kx-\omega t)\\u_t(x,t)=-\omega A \sin(kx- \omega t)\\ u_{tt}(x,t)=-\omega^2 A \cos(kx-\omega t)$$

Thus, it has to hold that:

$$-A \omega^2 \cos(kx-\omega t)=-a A k^2 \cos(kx \omega t)$$

or equivalently

$$A(\omega^2-ak^2) \cos(kx-\omega t)=0 (\forall x,t \in \mathbb{R})$$

The above holds if $\omega^2=ak^2$.

Thus $u(x,t)=Acos(k(x- \sqrt{a}t))$ is a solution of the wave equation of the form of a wave funcion, where $k>0$.Remark:

At the above example we see that, if $k_1, k_2>0$ wave numbers with $k_1 \neq k_2$ then we have solutions of the form of a wavefunction$$u_1(x,t)=A \cos(k_1(x- \sqrt{a}t))$$$$u_2(x,t)=A \cos(k_2(x- \sqrt{a}t))$$

that "travel" with the same velocity $\sqrt{a}$.Could you explain me why we can just change the wavenumber but let the circular frequencyas it is?
I.e. why can we write the following? (Thinking)$$u_1(x,t)=A \cos(k_1(x- \sqrt{a}t))$$$$u_2(x,t)=A \cos(k_2(x- \sqrt{a}t))$$

All becomes 'all right' if You write the equation in the more usual form...

$\displaystyle u_{t t} = a^{2}\ u_{x x}\ (1)$

... so that the two independent solution are...

$\displaystyle u_{1} = A\ \cos \{k_{1}\ (x - a\ t) \}$

$\displaystyle u_{2} = A\ \cos \{k_{2}\ (x + a\ t)\}\ (2)$

The first is a wave traveling from left to right and the second a wave traveling from right to left...

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
  • #3
I think that we can also write the wave equation as $u_{tt}=au_{xx}$.

The solution is of the form $u(x,t)=A \cos(kx- \omega t)$ and it has to hold that $\omega^2=ak^2$.

If we suppose that $k=k_1$ then $\omega^2=ak_1^2 \Rightarrow \omega= \sqrt{a} k_1$.
And if $k=k_2$ then $\omega= \sqrt{a} k_2$.

So, for the first case $u(x,t)=A \cos(k_1x- \sqrt{a} k_1 t)=A \cos(k_1(x- \sqrt{a}t))$ and for the second case $u(x,t)=A \cos(k_2(x- \sqrt{a}t))$. So, we see that these two solutions have the same velocity, despite of the fact that the wave numbers are different.
 

FAQ: Why can we only change the wavenumber?

Why is wavenumber the only parameter that can be changed?

The wavenumber is the only parameter that can be changed because it is a fundamental property of a wave. It represents the number of waves per unit distance and is directly related to the wavelength, frequency, and speed of the wave. Therefore, changing the wavenumber affects all other aspects of the wave.

Can't we change the wavelength or frequency instead?

While the wavelength and frequency of a wave can be manipulated to a certain extent, they are ultimately determined by the wavenumber. For example, if you increase the frequency of a wave, the wavelength must decrease in proportion to maintain the same wavenumber. Similarly, changing the wavelength will also affect the frequency. Therefore, changing the wavenumber is the most direct and efficient way to alter a wave's properties.

Why is the wavenumber expressed in inverse length units?

The wavenumber is typically expressed in inverse length units (such as 1/cm) because it represents the number of waves per unit distance. This allows for easier comparison between different waves and simplifies calculations involving wave properties.

Is there any way to change a wave's wavenumber without affecting its other properties?

No, changing the wavenumber will inevitably alter other properties of the wave such as wavelength, frequency, and speed. This is because all of these properties are interrelated and cannot be changed independently.

Can we change the wavenumber of any type of wave?

Yes, the concept of wavenumber applies to all types of waves, including electromagnetic waves, sound waves, and water waves. However, the specific units used to measure wavenumber may vary depending on the type of wave being studied.

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top