Why can't we let z = 2 in this parametric surface?

In summary, the parametrization for a cylinder is given by r = <3cos\theta, 3sin\theta, z> with intervals of 0≤θ≤2π and 0≤z≤2 to account for the boundedness of the surface. Setting z=2 would only result in a circle, not a cylinder.
  • #1
flyingpig
2,579
1

Homework Statement



[PLAIN]http://img191.imageshack.us/img191/5128/unledymj.jpg

My book says

[tex]r = <3cos\theta, 3sin\theta, z>[/tex]

I understand what they are doing, but why don't they set z = 2 for the parametrization instead?

[tex]r = <3cos\theta, 3sin\theta, 2>[/tex]

Like the radius, don't we just know how far it goes?


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
If you set z=2 you have the parametrization of a circle, not a cylinder. You do know that the cylinder is bounded, but you have to let z vary to obtain a cylinder.
Here's the thing. When you do these sorts of problems, the position vector is only part of the parametrization. The position vector by itself often isn't the surface in question. For instance in this problem r is not the cylinder between z=0 and z=2, it is just an unbounded cylinder. The intervals for the parametrization provide the rest of the information. So the whole parametrization is
[itex]\vec{r}=3cos\theta\hat{i}+3sin\theta\hat{j}+z\hat{k}[/itex] for [itex]0\leq\theta\leq 2\pi[/itex] and [itex]0\leq z\leq 2[/itex].
 
  • #3
You are parameterizing in θ and z, so when you are integrating wrt θ and z. If z=2, then you'd just be doing one plane and not from z=0 to z=2.
 

FAQ: Why can't we let z = 2 in this parametric surface?

Why can't we let z = 2 in this parametric surface?

When working with parametric surfaces, the variables x, y, and z are used to represent coordinates in three-dimensional space. All three variables are necessary to fully describe the surface. If we were to set z equal to a specific value, such as 2, we would essentially be flattening the surface and losing the third dimension. This would result in a two-dimensional shape, which may not accurately represent the original surface.

Can we approximate z = 2 in this parametric surface?

In some cases, it may be possible to approximate the value of z to be close to 2, but it would still not accurately represent the original surface. This is because the value of z is dependent on the values of x and y, so even if we were to find a point on the surface where z is close to 2, it may not hold true for all points on the surface.

3. Are there any exceptions where z = 2 is allowed in a parametric surface?

In general, setting z equal to a specific value in a parametric surface is not recommended. However, there may be some special cases where it is acceptable. For example, if the surface is a cylinder with a constant radius, we could set z equal to any value and still have an accurate representation of the surface.

4. How does setting z = 2 affect the parametric equations of the surface?

Setting z equal to a specific value will result in a different set of parametric equations for the surface. This is because the original equations would have a third variable, z, while the new equations would only have x and y as variables. This can drastically change the shape and characteristics of the surface.

5. Can we use z = 2 as a constraint in a parametric surface?

Yes, it is possible to use z = 2 as a constraint in a parametric surface. This means that the surface would be limited to only points where z is equal to 2. However, this would result in a flat surface and may not accurately represent the original surface. It is important to consider the implications of using constraints in parametric surfaces and whether they are appropriate for the specific surface being studied.

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Back
Top