Why Do MATLAB and My Calculator Show Different Results for g(x) and h(x)?

  • #1
ver_mathstats
260
21
Homework Statement
We are required to explain the values of g(x) and h(x).

The script for Matlab is:
g = @(x) (exp(x)-1-x)./x.^2;
h = @(x) (exp(x)-x-1)./x.^2;
x = 1e-10;
fprintf(’x=%.16e\ng(x)=%.16e\nh(x)=%.16e\n’, x, g(x), h(x))
x = 2^(-33);
fprintf(’x=%.16e\ng(x)=%.16e\nh(x)=%.16e\n’, x, g(x), h(x))

The output is:
x=1.0000000000000000e-10
g(x)=8.2740370962658164e+02
h(x)=0.0000000000000000e+00
x=1.1641532182693481e-10
g(x)=0.0000000000000000e+00
h(x)=0.0000000000000000e+00
Relevant Equations
-
I am having a bit of trouble understanding what the values of g(x) and h(x) mean. I went through it by hand and here is information that I gathered about the values and questions I am trying to answer to gain a better understanding. Firstly, for the value of x=1e-10 both the numerator of g(x) and the numerator of h(x) equate to the same number on my calculator and of course they have the same denominator, but then I don't understand why g(x) equals a positive number whereas h(x) equals 0, does this all just come from the error? I get the answer I am expecting for g(x) but not h(x).

Secondly, when I calculate g(x) for x=2-33 I get a negative number and when I calculate h(x) when x=2-33 I get 0. But why would the output for g(x) be 0 on MATLAB but when I calculate it I obtain a negative number? Is this simply only due to the precision of using 16 decimals whereas on my calculator it's much less?

Any help would be appreciated, thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
ver_mathstats said:
I went through it by hand ... equate to the same number on my calculator
Working it out on your calculator is not going through it by hand.

ver_mathstats said:
does this all just come from the error? ... Is this simply only due to the precision of using 16 decimals whereas on my calculator it's much less?
This question is all about the impact of the order of operations on roundoff error.
 
  • Like
Likes ver_mathstats and DrClaude

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
416
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top