- #1
EProph
- 13
- 0
Forgive me if this is a dumb question but,
I know that when I see an object's "color" I'm really just seeing the wavelengths of light that weren't absorbed by that object's surface (right?).
Why then do some colored objects (matte objects, not glossy objects) take on the different color tones of other nearby objects?
For example, if I put a vibrant red object next to a vibrant blue object, both in a strong diffused light source, why am I able to see red/purple tones in the blue object where it faces the red object (and vice versa)?
As I understand it, white light strikes the red object and then red light is reflected off of the object while the rest of the light's colors are absorbed. This red reflected light then strikes a blue object nearby which takes on a red/purple tone.
Why doesn't the blue object absorb this red light like it absorbed the red light from the white light source?
Thank you in advance for any help you can offer.
EP
I know that when I see an object's "color" I'm really just seeing the wavelengths of light that weren't absorbed by that object's surface (right?).
Why then do some colored objects (matte objects, not glossy objects) take on the different color tones of other nearby objects?
For example, if I put a vibrant red object next to a vibrant blue object, both in a strong diffused light source, why am I able to see red/purple tones in the blue object where it faces the red object (and vice versa)?
As I understand it, white light strikes the red object and then red light is reflected off of the object while the rest of the light's colors are absorbed. This red reflected light then strikes a blue object nearby which takes on a red/purple tone.
Why doesn't the blue object absorb this red light like it absorbed the red light from the white light source?
Thank you in advance for any help you can offer.
EP