Why Do Periodical Cicadas Die Simultaneously After Emergence?

  • Thread starter Vanadium 50
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Cycle Life
In summary, periodical cicadas die simultaneously after emergence primarily due to their synchronized life cycle, which is an evolutionary strategy that enhances reproductive success. This mass emergence allows them to overwhelm predators through sheer numbers, increasing the chances of survival for the next generation. Once they have mated and laid eggs, their life cycle culminates in a coordinated death, which is a natural part of their life span.
  • #1
Vanadium 50
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Education Advisor
2023 Award
35,005
21,683
Fermilab has been hit by the every-17-years plagues of periodical cicadas.

Two days ago, the noise was deafening. Yesterday it was quieter. Today you need to struggle to hear one or two. Dead ones litter the ground.

Why do they die at the same time? Emergence took 4 or 5 days. I would expect them to die on a somewhat longer timescale.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
  • #2
If they all emerged on the same night, they should have similar lifespan aside from a few stragglers, as they don’t feed. The annual cicadas live much longer because they actually feed on trees and plants during their several weeks above ground. (And the occasional attempt to feed on humans who try to admire them in their hand. They realize pretty quickly that you’re not a tree and buzz off.)
 
  • Like
Likes Klystron and BillTre
  • #3
Is it possible they emerged over a day or so and lived a day or two? Particularly if the distribution of the survival times is skewed to the right (likely) there'd be a fairly sharp peak in population after a day or so when they're all hatched but haven't started to die yet, then a (comparatively) slower fall off until you've only got the longer-lived late-hatchers.

(Obligatory "git off o' my lawn" at the last stragglers.)
 
  • #4
At the risk of getting all mathy, I'd expect the variance in dying to be equal to the variation in emerging plus the variance in adult lifetime (which might be zero).

But it seems that the variance in dying is smaller than the variance in emerging.
 
  • #6
Well, it is true that like most 17 year olds, they have just one thing on their minds.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Love
Likes sbrothy, Drakkith and berkeman
  • #7
Vanadium 50 said:
At the risk of getting all mathy, I'd expect the variance in dying to be equal to the variation in emerging plus the variance in adult lifetime (which might be zero).

But it seems that the variance in dying is smaller than the variance in emerging.
Maybe they are easier to count when lying on the ground vs flying in the air or sitting in a tree?
 
  • #8
I was just going to say. The experimental setup here is atrocious. The half-hearted attempt at statistical analysis is neither here nor there when you're going by ear and memory.
If only that Vanadium guy was here, he'd give you a stern and brusque, but ultimately educational, talking-to for trying to draw conclusions when you don't even know if you have any data.
 
  • Like
Likes sbrothy, russ_watters and Borg
  • #9
A mayfly lasts about a day too. Genetic programming. What I find more interesting is that their emergence are based on primes.
 
  • #10
It is true I have not done statistics. The effect on sound is real, if unmeasured. If you do not live in an area where these bugs live (hemiptera, so "bug" is appropriate) you have no idea how loud they can be.

It's also not a bug or two. It's a couple bugs per square meter. Maybe even one per square foot in places.

They are not mayflys. Their life cycle is (I am told) ~4 weeks as adults. My puzzlement is that the lifetime seems anticorrelated with emergence time - the ramp down is faster than the ramp up.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
40
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
9K
Replies
48
Views
63K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top