- #1
goingmeta
- 21
- 0
I was doing some searching and landed on a post by micromass where it was revealed that he/she had taken twenty-some math courses at the undergraduate level at a university in Belgium. I got the impression from that thread that it was not uncommon to have taken that many.
I'm currently an undergraduate who started mathematics late. At graduation, if all goes well, I will have taken around 10 proof based math courses (such as algebraic geometry, algebraic topology, and so forth). My American university, which is well known, requires 8. I don't think that number is uncommon (or unrepresentative) for many American universities and I feel it will be substantial work, for me, to even achieve that many. I recognize that there are some who will exceed that amount by a lot, but even in my program, I get feeling the they are in the minority.
At this point, I feel somewhat intimidated because I'm underprepared. Why is there this difference? What is the justification for having such a lower requirement? Are there trade-offs?
(Obviously I generalized in this post from my experience, feel free to correct me.)
I'm currently an undergraduate who started mathematics late. At graduation, if all goes well, I will have taken around 10 proof based math courses (such as algebraic geometry, algebraic topology, and so forth). My American university, which is well known, requires 8. I don't think that number is uncommon (or unrepresentative) for many American universities and I feel it will be substantial work, for me, to even achieve that many. I recognize that there are some who will exceed that amount by a lot, but even in my program, I get feeling the they are in the minority.
At this point, I feel somewhat intimidated because I'm underprepared. Why is there this difference? What is the justification for having such a lower requirement? Are there trade-offs?
(Obviously I generalized in this post from my experience, feel free to correct me.)
Last edited: