Why Do We Introduce Constants in Proportional Relationships?

  • Thread starter Thread starter StupidGenius
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Constant
AI Thread Summary
Introducing constants in proportional relationships is essential to convert proportionality into equality, as they quantify the relationship between variables. When stating "y is proportional to x," the constant of proportionality determines how changes in x affect changes in y. For instance, in the equations y = 3x and y = 2x, the constants 3 and 2 specify the exact relationship and rate of change. This process effectively narrows down a family of proportional curves to a specific curve by fixing the constants. Thus, constants are crucial for defining precise mathematical relationships in proportionality.
StupidGenius
19
0
My proff mentioned something about proportionality:
"To make an a proportionality into an equality, we must introduce a constant"
Something along those words: my question is why? Can show prove this to me??
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
StupidGenius said:
My proff mentioned something about proportionality:
"To make an a proportionality into an equality, we must introduce a constant"
Something along those words: my question is why? Can show prove this to me??
I am not aware of any proof of the concept, but I can offer a reason. Consider the statement "y is proportional to x". This means that a finite change in x induces a finite change in y. The size of the change in y depends on the size of the change in x. Now to quantify it, we need to introduce the so-called constant of proportionality. It is this constant that determines how big the change in y is for a given change in x.

For example, take the equation y = 3x. Clearly y is proportional to x and if x changes by +1, then y changes by +3. Equally, consider the equation y = 2x. Once again, y is clearly proportional to x, but this time for each integer step of x, y changes by 2.

This is why we need to introduce such constants. More technically, a proportionality defines a family of curves, by fixing the constant of proportionality (as well as the additive constant) you are effectively choosing a single curve from the family.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation has no solutions with positive integers if It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top