Why do we use negative signs for clockwise moments in torque calculations?

  • Thread starter mechanicstudy
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Moments
In summary, the conversation discusses a problem with finding the moment of two forces and the confusion of the answer being 19.08 nm clockwise. The summary explains that the moment due to each force is calculated by multiplying the force by the perpendicular distance to the point of rotation. The concept of negative torque is also explained, and it is noted that it is important to distinguish between clockwise and anticlockwise moments when both are present.
  • #1
mechanicstudy
5
0
I'm stuck on this problem at the moment.
X3t2W.jpg


The answer is 19.08 nm clockwise but i just don't see how it can be.

Check this.

2.8x(0.8+5.5)= 17.64 nm

If I use the 4.6 it ends up
4.6x(0.8+5.5) = 28.98 nm

I don't get how it can be 19.08 clockwise when there is only one force going clockwise or anticlockwise. That moment from that force isn't 19 though.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The moment due to the 2.8 N force is (2.8)(5.5)= 15.4 Nm (The force is multiplied by the length of the arm perpendicular to the force). The moment due to the 4.6 N force is (4.6)(0.8)= 3.68 Nm for a total of 15.4+ 3.68= 19.08 Nm
 
  • #3
HallsofIvy said:
The moment due to the 2.8 N force is (2.8)(5.5)= 15.4 Nm (The force is multiplied by the length of the arm perpendicular to the force). The moment due to the 4.6 N force is (4.6)(0.8)= 3.68 Nm for a total of 15.4+ 3.68= 19.08 Nm


I don't get how that would work. The 2.8 Force would have to go through 0.8m distance to get to point A.
 
  • #4
mechanicstudy said:
I don't get how that would work. The 2.8 Force would have to go through 0.8m distance to get to point A.
No, only the perpendicular distance matters. (The distance perpendicular to the line of force.) As far as the 2.8 N force is concerned, that 0.8m distance could be 800m and it would make no difference. Read this: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/torq.html" (Torque is another name for moment.)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #5
Finally i get it. Ok i got a questions to ask.

1: When does clockwise become negative? When i look at the notes i have been given. Sometimes its negative and sometimes it's not. Does it only become negative when an Anticlockwise force is present?

thanks by the way.
 
  • #6
mechanicstudy said:
1: When does clockwise become negative? When i look at the notes i have been given. Sometimes its negative and sometimes it's not.
Calling clockwise moments negative is just the standard convention. Often you only care about the magnitude of the torque, so the direction doesn't matter.
Does it only become negative when an Anticlockwise force is present?
You must distinguish anticlockwise from clockwise torques when both are present, and using the standard sign convention is a great way to do that.
 
  • #7
Doc Al said:
Calling clockwise moments negative is just the standard convention. Often you only care about the magnitude of the torque, so the direction doesn't matter.

You must distinguish anticlockwise from clockwise torques when both are present, and using the standard sign convention is a great way to do that.

thank you. My notes just seem to neglect information like that and it has left me confused.
 

FAQ: Why do we use negative signs for clockwise moments in torque calculations?

What are "Moments that don't add up"?

"Moments that don't add up" refer to situations or events that seem contradictory or confusing, and do not seem to make sense based on the information or evidence available.

Why do "Moments that don't add up" occur?

There can be various reasons for moments that don't add up, such as incomplete information, human error, or conflicting perspectives. It is important to investigate such moments further to understand the underlying causes.

How do scientists deal with "Moments that don't add up"?

Scientists approach moments that don't add up by using the scientific method, which involves making observations, formulating hypotheses, conducting experiments, and analyzing data to reach logical conclusions. They also collaborate with other scientists and review existing research to gain a better understanding of the phenomenon.

Can "Moments that don't add up" lead to new discoveries?

Yes, moments that don't add up can often lead to new discoveries or breakthroughs in science. When something doesn't fit with existing theories or knowledge, it can prompt scientists to question their assumptions and explore new ideas, leading to new discoveries and advancements in their field.

How can we apply the concept of "Moments that don't add up" in everyday life?

In everyday life, we can apply the concept of moments that don't add up by being critical thinkers and questioning things that seem contradictory or don't make sense. By examining these moments more closely, we can gain a deeper understanding of the world around us and make more informed decisions.

Similar threads

Back
Top