- #1
LearninDaMath
- 295
- 0
Say I have 10(H2O) that ionizes into H and OH. The reaction would be
10(H2O)→10(H) +10(OH)
Because if you have 10 of something, and then then split it into 2 pieces, you have 10 of each piece.
If I have 1 piece of paper and I tear it into 2 pieces, I have 1 piece in my right hand and 1 piece in my left hand. It makes sense.
The reactions is
1 full paper → 1 torn piece + 1 torn piece.
So just like 1 torn piece of paper + 1 torn piece of paper ≠ 2 full pieces of paper,
10(H)+10(OH) ≠ 20(H2O).
But how the the heck is this following equation true:
[itex]10^{-14}M(H2O) = 10^{-7}M(H^{+})+10^{-7}M(OH^{-})[/itex]
Why is it not:
[itex]10^{-7}M(H2O) = 10^{-7}M(H^{+})+10^{-7}M(OH^{-})[/itex]?
10(H2O)→10(H) +10(OH)
Because if you have 10 of something, and then then split it into 2 pieces, you have 10 of each piece.
If I have 1 piece of paper and I tear it into 2 pieces, I have 1 piece in my right hand and 1 piece in my left hand. It makes sense.
The reactions is
1 full paper → 1 torn piece + 1 torn piece.
So just like 1 torn piece of paper + 1 torn piece of paper ≠ 2 full pieces of paper,
10(H)+10(OH) ≠ 20(H2O).
But how the the heck is this following equation true:
[itex]10^{-14}M(H2O) = 10^{-7}M(H^{+})+10^{-7}M(OH^{-})[/itex]
Why is it not:
[itex]10^{-7}M(H2O) = 10^{-7}M(H^{+})+10^{-7}M(OH^{-})[/itex]?