- #1
makris
- 11
- 0
Hi all,
I have the following question.
A = nxn non singular matrix
I = nxn identity matrix
li = eigevalues of A i=1,2...n
ui = eigenvectors corresponding to the previous eigenvalues.
It true that
( A - l1 * I ) * x =0
is satisfied by any vector of the form x = a1 * u1 where a1= arbitrary real number
Lanczos in his book Applied Analysis p. 61 claims that the following quadratic equation in A
( A - l1 * I ) * ( A - l2 * I ) * x = 0
is satisfied by an arbitrary linear combination of the first two eigenvectors
x = a1 * u1 + a2 * u2
It is not very obvious to me why this happens.
(Extending this to include n eigenvectors and eigenvalues will eventually lead to the so called Cayley-Hamilton theorem.)
I was wondering if you could give me a hint starting from first principals.
Thanks
I have the following question.
A = nxn non singular matrix
I = nxn identity matrix
li = eigevalues of A i=1,2...n
ui = eigenvectors corresponding to the previous eigenvalues.
It true that
( A - l1 * I ) * x =0
is satisfied by any vector of the form x = a1 * u1 where a1= arbitrary real number
Lanczos in his book Applied Analysis p. 61 claims that the following quadratic equation in A
( A - l1 * I ) * ( A - l2 * I ) * x = 0
is satisfied by an arbitrary linear combination of the first two eigenvectors
x = a1 * u1 + a2 * u2
It is not very obvious to me why this happens.
(Extending this to include n eigenvectors and eigenvalues will eventually lead to the so called Cayley-Hamilton theorem.)
I was wondering if you could give me a hint starting from first principals.
Thanks