Why does biology deal with why questions?

  • Thread starter BillTre
  • Start date
In summary, the conversation discusses the use of "why" questions in physics and biology. While "why" questions are not typically part of physics, they are often addressed in biology, especially in regards to the goals and adaptive traits of living organisms. The conversation also explores the concept of natural selection and how it plays a role in the evolution and persistence of life. Overall, the difference between biology and other sciences, such as physics and chemistry, is highlighted.
  • #1
BillTre
Science Advisor
Gold Member
2,591
10,603
I started this thread inspired by the following quotes from the often provocative @PeterDonis:

PeterDonis said:
No, "why" questions are not part of physics, or indeed of any science. At least not if you expect a final answer to any of them.
PeterDonis said:
And that will be true of any "why" question in any science: ultimately it will come to a point where the only answer is "just because".

Biology is a field that addresses several kinds of "why" questions.
Unlike physics and chemistry, biology often deals with populations of animated entities with agent like properties. These can generate "why?" questions.
Living entities have evolved goals, in order to maximize their reproductive potential. The reason for their goal's existence can therefore be addressed with "why?" questions.
Their self-powered pursuit of these goals is, to a large extent, why biology, although constrained to follow the "laws of physics", can evade many normal physical limitations (such as not running down to a thermodynamic equilibrium, while alive), in order to gain their place the world.

The simplest kind of "why?" question (which may be a "how" question) involves direct causal sequences, such as: "Why does a frog's leg twitch when the nerve is electrically shocked?".
These can be referred to as proximal explanations or causes (being a more immediate cause of the event under consideration).
These might end up in Peter's category of "ultimately it will come to a point where the only answer is "just because"", when the explanations bottom out in the physics and chemistry underlying the situation. Or maybe they are just a how question restated.

Another set of "why?" questions are of a more ultimate kind (further removed from the event under consideration, a more ultimate explanation for a particular event).
In biology, these involve questions like "why did the frog evolve to have muscle movement controlled by its nervous system?" (such as: better body control, which ultimately facilitates better reproduction). These more ultimate questions are concerned with the adaptive reason for a biological trait to exist, and ultimately. They come down to reproductive advantage.
Exceptions to this, would occur when selective mechanisms breakdown, such as in small isolated breeding populations. This could result in random genetic drift overwhelming normal selective powers. However, such a result could also provide an answer to a "why?" question. Or it could be considered a "how is this change occurring?" question, avoiding the "why?".

A third, higher order kind of "why?" question deals with "why is there selection acting on populations, for or against different traits?".
Or "why does selection work?". I suppose that this could be rephrased as a "How does selection work?" question, that seems like avoiding thee issue to me.
However, classified, there are satisfactory answers to these kinds of questions, to be found in the processes underlying natural selection.

A population of replicating entities (like organisms) will come, over time, to be numerically dominated by those that do the best job of replicating (reproducing), in their specific environment (that in which they live, interact with, and from which they harvest their required resources).
Variants among the population that are better (or worse) suited, in some way, for their particular environment, will become more (or less) prevalent in their population, over time.
Competition among replicating entities is enhanced when a population of entities, that depends upon the same set of limited environmental resources, has reached the limits of their their environment's carrying capacity.
Organisms using different resources are not in direct competition.

Addy Pross has compared the mechanisms of natural selection with those underlying his Dynamic Kinetic Stability (DKS) view of populations of replicating chemical systems (new field called Systems Chemistry).
He has written a nice little book on this: What is Life?: How Chemistry Becomes Biology.
(There are surprising number of "What is Life?" books around, besides Schrödinger's classic.)
Pross's argument is that when analyzing replicating chemical systems, he finds processes equivalent to those underlying how natural selection acts on replicating biological systems.
The dynamic persistence, within a breeding population, of a group of replicating entities (the individuals in a population or a species) can result in a stable set of traits (a property of the group itself), even though the population's individuals are constantly turning over. Among the traits can be the organisms evolved set of goals, which are often "why" they are doing things.
This contrasts with how normal inanimiate physical entities (like objects).
Their prevalence (continued existence) can be explained by their stable thermodynamic states and their passive thermodynamic interactions with their environment.

This is a basic difference between the subject matter of biology, and that of physics and chemistry.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman, 256bits and BWV
Biology news on Phys.org
  • #2
Great post, Bill. So it sounds like the answer to "Why does life exist" is basically "Because it has evolved to survive" (at least so far). Starting from humble and very simple beginnings, the things that survived to reproduce did so because of mutations and adaptations that helped them to survive through the generations. Mutations and adaptations that did not work well were selected against and declined or disappeared. (Modulo large disturbances like meteor impacts, ice ages, etc.).

It's interesting how the concept of mutations and evolution leading to survival over generations can provide "why" answers that differ from other sciences...
 
  • Like
Likes BillTre

FAQ: Why does biology deal with why questions?

Why is understanding the "why" behind biological processes important?

The "why" in biology refers to the underlying reasons and explanations for the various phenomena observed in living organisms. Understanding the "why" allows scientists to gain a deeper understanding of how living things function and interact with their environment. This knowledge can then be applied to various fields such as medicine, agriculture, and conservation.

How does biology address "why" questions?

Biology uses the scientific method to address "why" questions. This involves making observations, forming hypotheses, conducting experiments, and analyzing data to draw conclusions. By following this systematic approach, scientists can uncover the underlying mechanisms and reasons for biological phenomena.

Can "why" questions in biology be definitively answered?

While biology can provide explanations for many "why" questions, it is important to recognize that the field is constantly evolving and there may not always be a definitive answer. As new technologies and research methods emerge, our understanding of biological processes may change, leading to new explanations and hypotheses.

How does understanding the "why" in biology benefit society?

Understanding the "why" in biology has numerous benefits for society. It can lead to advancements in medicine, such as the development of new treatments for diseases. It can also inform conservation efforts by helping us understand the impact of human activities on the natural world. Additionally, understanding the "why" in biology can also help us make more informed decisions about our own health and well-being.

Are "why" questions only relevant to biology?

No, "why" questions are relevant to many other fields of science such as physics, chemistry, and psychology. In fact, understanding the "why" in biology often requires an interdisciplinary approach, as biological processes are often influenced by physical and chemical factors, as well as psychological and social factors.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
28
Views
9K
Replies
1
Views
31K
Replies
2
Views
6K
Replies
21
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top