Why Does Electrolysis of Sodium Sulphate Show Contradictory Indicator Changes?

  • Thread starter Link
  • Start date
In summary, the conversation discusses the electrolysis of sodium sulphate, with the formula Na2SO4 + 2H2O ----> 2NaOH + H2SO4. During the lab, the cathode indicated a basic solution, while the anode indicated an acidic solution. This is explained using electric potentials, with water having an electric potential of 2.06 V and sodium sulphate having an electric potential of 4.76 V. The battery used for the experiment was 3V. The individual is unsure of how these values result in the original reaction formula and requests clarification. They later state that they have solved the problem.
  • #1
Link
134
1
Ok this is about electrolysis of sodium Sulphate

I believe the formula is

Na2SO4 + 2H2O ----> 2NaOH + H2SO4

During the lab, the indicator at the cathode turned basic and the anode indicated acidic.

Explaining this using electric potentials:
Na + e = Na E = -2.71 V
H2O + e = ½ H2 + OH- E = -0.83 V
S2O8 + 2e = 2SO4 E = 2.05 V
½ O2 + 2H = H2O E = 1.23 V

water = 1.23 – (-0.83) = 2.06 V
sodiumSulphate = 2.05 – (-2.71) = 4.76 V

The battery used were 3V

I have no idea how this results in the original reaction formula above. Can someone englighten me? :smile:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
ummm i think i solved the problem, but thanks anyway.

Dunno how to delete the thread :cry:
 
  • #3


It is possible for the reactions to have contradicting predictions due to the complexity of the electrolysis process. The overall reaction of electrolysis of sodium sulphate can be represented by the formula Na2SO4 + 2H2O ----> 2NaOH + H2SO4. However, during the process, multiple reactions are taking place at the cathode and anode.

At the cathode, sodium ions (Na+) are reduced to sodium metal (Na) with a potential of -2.71 V. This means that sodium metal is the most favorable product at the cathode. However, water (H2O) can also be reduced to form hydrogen gas (H2) with a potential of -0.83 V. This means that hydrogen gas is also a possible product at the cathode.

At the anode, sulfate ions (SO4) are oxidized to form oxygen gas (O2) with a potential of 2.05 V. This means that oxygen gas is the most favorable product at the anode. However, water (H2O) can also be oxidized to form oxygen gas (O2) and hydrogen ions (H+) with a potential of 1.23 V. This means that both oxygen gas and hydrogen ions are possible products at the anode.

In this scenario, the battery used has a voltage of 3V, which is higher than the potential for hydrogen gas at the cathode (-0.83 V) and lower than the potential for oxygen gas at the anode (1.23 V). This means that both hydrogen gas and oxygen gas are produced during the electrolysis process, resulting in the basic and acidic indicators at the cathode and anode, respectively.

Therefore, the contradicting predictions are a result of multiple reactions occurring simultaneously during electrolysis, and the overall reaction formula is a representation of the most favorable products based on their individual potentials.
 

FAQ: Why Does Electrolysis of Sodium Sulphate Show Contradictory Indicator Changes?

What is the definition of contradicting predictions?

Contradicting predictions refer to two or more predictions that give opposing or conflicting outcomes for the same situation or phenomenon.

What causes contradicting predictions?

Contradicting predictions can be caused by a variety of factors, such as incomplete data, flawed assumptions, or different interpretations of the available information.

How can contradicting predictions be resolved?

Contradicting predictions can be resolved by further research and analysis to determine the most accurate and reliable prediction. It may also be necessary to revise or adjust the initial predictions based on new evidence.

What is the impact of contradicting predictions in science?

Contradicting predictions can lead to confusion and uncertainty in the scientific community, and can also hinder the progress of research and development. It is important for scientists to address and resolve contradicting predictions in order to advance scientific understanding.

How can scientists avoid making contradicting predictions?

Scientists can avoid making contradicting predictions by thoroughly examining and considering all available data, conducting rigorous experiments and analyses, and seeking peer review and feedback from other experts in the field.

Similar threads

Back
Top