Why does my toaster hum?

  • #1
snoopies622
852
29
TL;DR Summary
I know that the heating coils must be vibrating to make sound, and that the frequency of vibration must be related to that of the alternating electrical current coming through the wall. But i don't know the details.
For instance, a current through a wire makes a magnetic field around it, and the changing magnetic field creates an electrical field, which then creates a magnetic field, and so on. Are these fields pulling on the wire? If so, how exactly? Isn't every piece of the wire dx electrically neutral at any moment? Is it because the wire becomes a magnetic dipole and the created magnetic fields appear in such an orientation as to act on this dipole moment?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Is the hum at the mains frequency, or twice the mains frequency?
 
  • #3
Baluncore said:
Is the hum at the mains frequency, or twice the mains frequency?
Unfortunately i lost my tuning fork long ago, so I'm only making an assumption about the relationship between these two frequencies.
 
  • #4
Because it doesn't know the words! (Sorry.)

You can download instrument tuner apps that might give you an idea what frequency you're hearing.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Care
Likes pinball1970, davenn, sophiecentaur and 2 others
  • #5
The resistance wire in the heating element, will have parallel currents flowing, that have magnetic fields. If the currents are running in the same direction, the wires will attract, if the currents are in opposite directions, the wires will repel. As there are two current peaks per cycle, that will make a vibration at twice the mains frequency.

If there is a permanent magnet near an AC conductor, the magnet or the wire may move, causing a vibration at the mains frequency.

So the frequency of the possible hums will be one octave apart. That should be easy to identify.
 
  • Like
Likes snoopies622
  • #6
Thanks, Baluncore!
 
  • #7
The type of app I would look for is called a "spectrum analyzer".
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes pinball1970, jim mcnamara and dlgoff
  • #8
Ibix said:
Because it doesn't know the words!

But it may know that @snoopies622 is humgry!
 
  • #9
snoopies622 said:
TL;DR Summary: I know that the heating coils must be vibrating to make sound, and that the frequency of vibration must be related to that of the alternating electrical current coming through the wall. But i don't know the details.

because the wire becomes a magnetic dipole
Take any pair of conductors in the toaster. The current through each wire will be proportional to the (alternating frequency f) voltage. In the absence of any nearby permanent magnets the force between them will be proportional to the product of the currents. That is proportional to the square of the supply volts so you would expect the vibrations to be basically at 2f. In the presence of a significant permanent magnetism the force will be proportional to f.
It will be much more complicated than that because the mechanics (displacement related to volts) will not be linear but a raggedy squareish wave so the sound will be full of harmonics in addition to the fundamental or twice fundamental frequency driving force.

My dad used to be an EE, working for the Central Electricity Generating Board (CEGB in UK). He just wouldn't commit himself to saying if I could hear 50Hz or 150Hz when walking around a substation. Actually, we didn't have the discussion about 100Hz vs 300Hz. Those big transformers used to vibrate noticeably to the touch so I guess there was a lot of 100Hz about. I never saw a three phase toaster . . . .
 
  • Like
Likes snoopies622
  • #10
sophiecentaur said:
Those big transformers used to vibrate noticeably to the touch so I guess there was a lot of 100Hz about.
The distinctive transformer buzz, is due to magnetostriction within the iron core. That generates a second harmonic.
 
  • #11
Thanks, everyone! I've been asking this site questions for almost twenty years now - it's been priceless.
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970
  • #12
Baluncore said:
The distinctive transformer buzz, is due to magnetostriction within the iron core. That generates a second harmonic.
. . . . and a three phase transformer? These were three m high and a long walk round, iirc.
 
  • #13
Interesting: using my musical keyboard and my ears, it sounds like to me the most prominent frequencies from my toaster are the ones 2 and 3 octaves above the wall 60 hertz alternating current. (Of course, that may be where my ears are more sensitive.)
 
  • #14
snoopies622 said:
Interesting: using my musical keyboard and my ears, it sounds like to me the most prominent frequencies from my toaster are the ones 2 and 3 octaves above the wall 60 hertz alternating current.
You are correct, it is interesting. And your hearing is good, the hum will be rich in components, actually 1 and 2 octaves above the 60 Hz fundamental. (Zero is not 1, so I think you counted wrong, so NOT 2 and 3 octaves above the 60 hertz).

My explanation goes like this.

For a 60 Hz fundamental, the magnetic force between wires would be in the form of pulses, at the second harmonic, 120 Hz, one octave above the fundamental. It is that pulse train, at 120 pulses per second, that you are hearing as the hum.

Those pulses are one-sided, asymmetric about zero force. So the even harmonics of the pulses will be present. The first even harmonic is the second harmonic of the 120 Hz pulse train, which is at 240 Hz, the fourth harmonic of the 60 Hz mains fundamental, two octaves above the 60 Hz mains fundamental.

If the pulses were produced by a 60 Hz sinusoid and a permanent magnet, then the 60 Hz fundamental would dominate. Because those pulses are symmetrical about zero force, the odd harmonics may also be present. The first of those will be at 180 Hz, which is 3/2 octaves above the 60 Hz mains fundamental. That is not the case with your toaster.
 
  • Like
Likes Ibix and Delta Prime
  • #15
Baluncore said:
so I think you counted wrong, so NOT 2 and 3 octaves above the 60 hertz).
The popular pitfall of confusing Harmonics with Overtones. PF should sort this out, imo.
 
  • #16
sophiecentaur said:
PF should sort this out, imo.
I did my best to avoid the term overtones.

An octave is a factor of two, on the exponential musical scale, where the twelve notes per octave are separated by frequency ratios of ≈2(1/12).
The second harmonic is one octave above the fundamental.
The fourth harmonic is two octaves above the fundamental.

It gets confusing here because the hum is already one octave above the 60 Hz fundamental. Then the analysis is referenced to harmonics of the audio hum, not the 60 Hz AC.
 
  • #17
Baluncore said:
I did my best to avoid the term overtones.
Why? Pointing out the alternative term avoids confusion and many PFers need some help with that. The resulting frequencies from a 'squared' wave will be even harmonics of the (zero or much reduced) fundamental.

The 'Overtones' from an instrument could well have been easier to identify by a low tech instrument or bell maker without any electronics to help them (except maybe some tuning forks). It would be interesting to know where, why and when the two different quantities were named and used.
 
Last edited:
  • #18
The frequencies i heard were the ones just above the 440 A and the one an octave below that, which are two and three octaves above the 60 Hrz.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Back
Top