- #1
ZanyCat
- 21
- 0
This question seems incredibly straightforward, but my lecturer had a different answer to what I ended up with.
Essentially there's a painter with a mass of 70kg sitting on a chair of 10kg that is attached to a pulley on the roof via a rope (the pulley and rope are ideal,massless and frictionless). The painter is holding on to the rope that is hanging down from the other side of the pulley (I'll call this Part B of the rope, and the section attached to the chair -side of the pulley as Part A).
With what force must he pull down on the rope to accelerate upwards at 0.20 m/s^2?The net upward force acting on him/the chair must be 16N to accelerate at this rate. The FG is 80g (784) N downward, thus he needs a force of 800N from the rope pulling upwards.
By my thinking, if he pulls down with 800N on Part B of the rope, this will create a tension of 800N upwards on Part B, which will in turn yield a tension of 800N upwards on Part A of the rope.
My lecturer, however, is saying that he needs to pull downwards with only 400N. He was saying it had something to do with the fact that there are two forces acting upwards, namely the tension in Part B and Part A separately.
Which of us is going wrong, and where?
(sorry for the overly long explanation, a diagram would be a lot easier but my Paint skills leave a lot to be desired)
Essentially there's a painter with a mass of 70kg sitting on a chair of 10kg that is attached to a pulley on the roof via a rope (the pulley and rope are ideal,massless and frictionless). The painter is holding on to the rope that is hanging down from the other side of the pulley (I'll call this Part B of the rope, and the section attached to the chair -side of the pulley as Part A).
With what force must he pull down on the rope to accelerate upwards at 0.20 m/s^2?The net upward force acting on him/the chair must be 16N to accelerate at this rate. The FG is 80g (784) N downward, thus he needs a force of 800N from the rope pulling upwards.
By my thinking, if he pulls down with 800N on Part B of the rope, this will create a tension of 800N upwards on Part B, which will in turn yield a tension of 800N upwards on Part A of the rope.
My lecturer, however, is saying that he needs to pull downwards with only 400N. He was saying it had something to do with the fact that there are two forces acting upwards, namely the tension in Part B and Part A separately.
Which of us is going wrong, and where?
(sorry for the overly long explanation, a diagram would be a lot easier but my Paint skills leave a lot to be desired)