Why Doesn't Mathematica Produce an Explicit Inverse for My Function?

In summary, an inverse function in Mathematica is a function that "undoes" the action of another function. To find the inverse of a function in Mathematica, you can use the built-in function InverseFunction. The notation for inverse functions in Mathematica is f^-1[x], where f is the original function and x is the input. Some common mistakes when using inverse functions include forgetting to restrict the domain of the original function and using the wrong notation. Inverse functions can also be used to solve equations in Mathematica by taking the inverse of both sides of an equation.
  • #1
roam
1,271
12
I'm trying to find the inverse of a function, for instance: f(x)=(2x+1)/(x-1) using Mathematica but it doesn't produce any answers.

This is my input:

> f(x)=(2x+1)/(x-1)

> InverseFunction[f]

The output is always something like:

"InverseFunction[(1+2x)/(-1+x)]"

So, does anyone know what the problem is?

Thanks,
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
InverseFunction only evaluates for built-in functions like trig functions. I think you want:
Solve[y == (2 x + 1)/(x - 1), x]
 
  • #3
Oh I see... Thank you! :smile:
 
  • #4
Thank you very much roam, you've helped me to solve a big problem.
 
  • #5


I can understand your frustration with not being able to find the inverse of a function using Mathematica. First, it's important to note that not all functions have an inverse that can be easily expressed in terms of elementary functions. In the case of the function you provided, f(x)=(2x+1)/(x-1), Mathematica is correctly giving you the inverse as InverseFunction[(1+2x)/(-1+x)]. This is a valid representation of the inverse function, but it may not be the most intuitive form for you.

One possible reason for Mathematica not producing any answers could be that the function you provided is not one-to-one, meaning that there are multiple inputs that can give the same output. In this case, the inverse function would not exist or may not be well-defined. It's always important to check the domain and range of a function when trying to find its inverse.

In general, finding the inverse of a function can be a challenging task and may require more advanced mathematical techniques. If you are looking for a more simplified or explicit form of the inverse function, you may need to use additional commands or functions in Mathematica. I would suggest consulting Mathematica's documentation or seeking assistance from a mathematician or computer scientist who is familiar with the software.

Overall, Mathematica is a powerful tool for mathematical computations, but it's important to understand the limitations and nuances of the software when using it for complex tasks such as finding inverse functions. Keep exploring and don't hesitate to seek help when needed.
 

FAQ: Why Doesn't Mathematica Produce an Explicit Inverse for My Function?

What is an inverse function in Mathematica?

An inverse function in Mathematica is a function that "undoes" the action of another function. In other words, if a function f(x) produces an output y, the inverse function would take y as an input and produce x as an output.

How do I find the inverse of a function in Mathematica?

To find the inverse of a function in Mathematica, you can use the built-in function InverseFunction. This function takes the original function as an argument and returns the inverse function.

What is the notation for inverse functions in Mathematica?

The notation for inverse functions in Mathematica is f^-1[x], where f is the original function and x is the input.

What are some common mistakes when using inverse functions in Mathematica?

One common mistake is forgetting to restrict the domain of the original function, which can result in multiple outputs for a single input. Another mistake is using the wrong notation for inverse functions, such as using f^-1[x] instead of f^-1[y].

Can inverse functions be used to solve equations in Mathematica?

Yes, inverse functions can be used to solve equations in Mathematica. By taking the inverse of both sides of an equation, you can often simplify the equation and solve for the unknown variable.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
502
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top