Why Doesn't the Coil Radius Affect the Induced EMF Calculation?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the induced EMF in a 15-turn coil surrounding a long solenoid with a changing current. The key equation used is emf = -Nd[flux]/dt, where the flux is calculated using the magnetic field inside the solenoid, which is independent of the coil's radius. It is clarified that the weak magnetic field outside the solenoid is typically neglected in such problems, making the radius of the coil irrelevant for the EMF calculation. The area used for flux calculations should be the cross-sectional area of the solenoid rather than that of the coil. Overall, the coil's distance from the solenoid does not affect the induced EMF due to these considerations.
Ithryndil
Messages
142
Reaction score
0
1. Homework Statement

A coil of 15 turns and radius 10cm surrounds a long solenoid of radius 2cm and 1x10^3 turns/m. The current in the solenoid changes as I = (5A)sin(120t). Find the induced emf in the 15-turn coil as a function of time.2. Homework Equations

emf = -Nd[flux]/dt

\Phi = \oint[B*dA]3. The Attempt at a Solution

Edit: I figured out what I was doing wrong. However, I am still puzzled on one aspect of this problem

When I figured out what I did wrong I came up with:

B = \munI
Emf = \frac{d}{dt}(NBAcos\theta) = \frac{d}{dt}(NBA) cos(theta) = 1 in this case
Therefore:<br /> Emf = NA\mun(I) ...and we have I so it's a simple derivative from there

What I don't get is why the .1m radius doesn't really come into play. Unless I missed something or am not thinking here at all, it's not necessary for this problem, other than to tell us the coils are outside the solenoid.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Bump.
 
What area is the one you call A? The area of the solenoid i suppose.
When you calculate the flux through the coil you should use (in general) the area of the coil.
But... for a "long solenoid", the field on the outside of the solenoid is very weak and is usually neglected in elementary problems.
The field of the solenoid B=I*N/L (no area) is inside the solenoid - does not depend upon the area of the solenoid.
 
The A I am using is the area of the solenoid...at least the cross sectional area.

Also, let me correct a mistake in that last equation:

<br /> Therefore:<br /> Emf = NA(\mu)n\frac{d}{dt}(I)<br />
 
Then you should see why.
When you calculate the flux through something, you should use the area of the "something".
Here you use the area (cross-section) of the solenoid instead because the field outside the solenoid is neglected (and you don't have a formula for the field outside anyway, in elementary textbooks)
 
Ok, so it doesn't matter that the coil of 15 turns is .08 cm away from the solenoid, we only need the solenoid radius for the flux...hmm, I must have missed that in class.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top