- #1
- 2,424
- 407
Seriously...Granite is 2% heavier than aluminum and takes considerably more time to change with ambient temperature. I value your input. all suggestions welcome.
I'd bet a good sum of your paycheque he's thinking he can invent a new product that would keep beer cooler.Merlin3189 said:So what we have to figure really, is why he's asking this question.
Ranger Mike said:The only advantage of using aluminum is that it weighs 2% less than granite.
Ranger Mike said:The only advantage of using aluminum is that it weighs 2% less than granite. The air bearings on an aluminum Cmm are held on using Belleville cone washers.
Ranger Mike said:This , to me, is not a good method for the long term due to cyclical failure.
Ranger Mike said:I would add that because Al is homogeneous it makes for a noisier CMM as at some point it has resonance. It becomes a tuning fork.
The idea of using granite to make beer cans is often brought up as a novelty or a way to stand out in the market. Some also believe that granite is a more durable and sustainable material compared to aluminum.
While granite is a strong and durable material, it is not suitable for storing beer. Granite is a porous material, meaning it can absorb liquids and potentially alter the taste of the beer. It is also heavy and difficult to shape into a can form.
No, granite cannot be recycled in the same way as aluminum cans. Granite is a natural stone and cannot be melted down and reshaped like aluminum. This makes it an unsustainable option for beer cans.
Granite is a more expensive material compared to aluminum. It is also heavier and more difficult to shape, which would drive up production costs. This would ultimately result in a more expensive product for consumers.
Safety and health concerns are a major factor in the production of food and beverage containers. Granite can contain trace amounts of minerals and metals that could potentially leach into the beer and pose a health risk. Therefore, it is not a suitable material for beer cans.