A Why don't we multiply generalized functions?

AI Thread Summary
Multiplying generalized functions leads to contradictions, as demonstrated by examples involving the Dirac delta function and other distributions. While it is valid to multiply generalized functions from the space of distributions with smooth functions, attempting to multiply two generalized functions results in inconsistencies. For instance, the expression involving the product of the delta function and a function that is not well-behaved leads to undefined results. This highlights the inability to define a binary operation on the space of distributions that adheres to standard multiplication properties. Consequently, the multiplication of generalized functions remains a complex and problematic area in mathematical analysis.
wrobel
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,163
Reaction score
997
Because it drives to contradictions. Here is a nice example from E. Rosinger Generalized solutions of nonlinear PDE.

We can multiply generalized functions from ##\mathcal D'(\mathbb{R})## by functions from ##C^\infty(\mathbb{R})##. This operation is well defined. For example $$x\delta(x)=0\in \mathcal D'(\mathbb{R}),\quad x\cdot\frac{1}{x}=1\in \mathcal D'(\mathbb{R}),\quad \frac{1}{x}\in \mathcal D'(\mathbb{R}).$$
On the other hand ##C^\infty(\mathbb{R})\subset \mathcal D'(\mathbb{R})##

Ok then:)
$$\delta=\Big(x\cdot\frac{1}{x}\Big)\cdot\delta=\frac{1}{x}\cdot(x\delta)=0.$$
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I have interpreted ##x \delta(x)=0## as for support of good behavior function, i.e.
\int f(x) x \delta(x) dx= 0
for f(x) such that f(0) is finite. 1/x does not satisfy it.
 
This example shows that you can not define a binary operation of ##\mathcal D'(\mathbb R)\times \mathcal D'(\mathbb R)## with values in ##\mathcal D'(\mathbb R) ## such that
1) this operation acts on ##C^\infty(\mathbb{R})\times \mathcal D'(\mathbb R)## in the standard way;
2) this operation possesses the standard properties of the arithmetic multiplication
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Is it possible to arrange six pencils such that each one touches the other five? If so, how? This is an adaption of a Martin Gardner puzzle only I changed it from cigarettes to pencils and left out the clues because PF folks don’t need clues. From the book “My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles”. Dover, 1994.

Similar threads

Back
Top