Why is A=F and B=T in the Truth Table for Implication?

In summary, the truth tables for A\Rightarrow B and A \Leftrightarrow B show the logical relationship between two statements. A\Rightarrow B means "if A is true then B is true" and A \Leftrightarrow B means "A if and only if B". While A\Rightarrow B can be interpreted as "if A then B else not B", it is important to note that it doesn't specify what happens if A is false. Therefore, it is considered true in both cases. Similarly, A \Leftrightarrow B can be read as "if A then B else not B", but it is always true when both A and B are either true or false.
  • #1
Gregg
459
0
The truth table for

[itex]A\Rightarrow B[/itex]

Means If A then B else Not B?

But the truth table is supposedly looking like this:

[itex]

\begin{array}{ccc}
A & B & A\Rightarrow B \\
T & T & T \\
T & F & F \\
F & T & T \\
F & F & T
\end{array}
[/itex]

Only problem I have is A=F and B=T? Why is this ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2


I like to think of it as "innocent until proven guilty"! [itex]A\Rightarrow B[/itex] means "if A is true then B is true". It doesn't say what happens if A is false. So we can logically take it either way and we choose to say it is true.

Suppose your professor tells you "If you get an "A" on every test, I will give you an "A" for the course" and then

1) You get an "A" on every test and you get an "A" for the course. Was he telling the truth? Of course he was.

2) You get an "A" on every test and you do NOT get an "A" for the course. Was he telling the truth? No, of course not.

3) You, say, fail every test and do NOT get an "A" for the course. Was he telling the truth? Actually, you can't know since you haven't "tested" what would have happened if you had gotten an "A" on every test. But I could see no reason for accusing your professor of lying.

4) You get an A on every test except one (on which you get a "B") and you get an "A" for the course. Was he telling the truth? Again, he didn't say what would happen if you didn't get an "A" on every test- and it would be very foolish of you to go to your professor and complain! Again, he is "innocent until proven guilty".
 
  • #3


Gregg said:
The truth table for

[itex]A\Rightarrow B[/itex]

Means If A then B else Not B?

But the truth table is supposedly looking like this:

[itex]

\begin{array}{ccc}
A & B & A \Rightarrow B \\
T & T & T \\
T & F & F \\
F & T & T \\
F & F & T
\end{array}
[/itex]

Only problem I have is A=F and B=T? Why is this ?

The other one,

[tex]
\begin{array}{ccc}
A & B & A ? B \\
T & T & T \\
T & F & F \\
F & T & F \\
F & F & T
\end{array}
[/tex]

also has a name, it is called [tex]A \Leftrightarrow B[/tex] or "A if and only if B". This one really is "if A then B else not B"
 
  • #4


g_edgar said:
The other one,

[tex]
\begin{array}{ccc}
A & B & A ? B \\
T & T & T \\
T & F & F \\
F & T & F \\
F & F & T
\end{array}
[/tex]

also has a name, it is called [tex]A \Leftrightarrow B[/tex] or "A if and only if B". This one really is "if A then B else not B"

thanks
 

FAQ: Why is A=F and B=T in the Truth Table for Implication?

What is a truth table implication?

A truth table implication is a logical statement that describes the relationship between two statements in terms of their truth values. It is represented by an arrow, and it indicates that if the first statement is true, then the second statement must also be true.

How is a truth table implication written?

A truth table implication is written as "p → q", where p and q are two logical statements. The arrow symbol (→) is used to represent the implication relationship.

What are the possible truth values for a truth table implication?

There are four possible truth values for a truth table implication: true (T), false (F), unknown (?), and contradiction (X). These values can be represented in a truth table to show the different combinations of truth values for the two statements.

How is a truth table implication evaluated?

A truth table implication is evaluated by comparing the truth values of the two statements. If the first statement is true and the second statement is true, then the implication is true. If the first statement is true and the second statement is false, then the implication is false. If the first statement is false, then the implication is always true.

What is the practical application of a truth table implication?

A truth table implication is commonly used in computer science and mathematics to represent logical relationships. It is also useful in decision making and problem solving, as it helps to determine the validity of arguments and the truthfulness of statements.

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top