MHB Why Is a Rectangle Considered Closed and Bounded in Volume Proofs?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathmari
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bounded Closed
mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hey! :o

I am looking at the proof of the theorem that for any rectangle the outer measure is equal to the volume.

At the beginning of the proof there is the following sentence:

It is enough to look at the case where the rectangle R is closed and bounded.

Why does it stand?? (Wondering)

Is it maybe as followed??A closed rectangle is
$$[a_1,b_1] \times [a_2,b_2] \times \dots \times [a_d,b_d]$$

An open rectangle is
$$(a_1,b_1) \times (a_2,b_2) \times \dots \times (a_d,b_d)$$
which can be written as a union of closed intervals.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mathmari said:
Is it maybe as followed??A closed rectangle is
$$[a_1,b_1] \times [a_2,b_2] \times \dots \times [a_d,b_d]$$

An open rectangle is
$$(a_1,b_1) \times (a_2,b_2) \times \dots \times (a_d,b_d)$$
which can be written as a union of closed intervals.

Or is there an other reason, why it is sufficient to suppose that $R$ is closed and bounded to prove that $m^*(R)=v(R)$?? (Wondering)
 
I posted this question on math-stackexchange but apparently I asked something stupid and I was downvoted. I still don't have an answer to my question so I hope someone in here can help me or at least explain me why I am asking something stupid. I started studying Complex Analysis and came upon the following theorem which is a direct consequence of the Cauchy-Goursat theorem: Let ##f:D\to\mathbb{C}## be an anlytic function over a simply connected region ##D##. If ##a## and ##z## are part of...
Back
Top