B Why is a simple pendulum not a perfect simple harmonic oscillator?

AI Thread Summary
A simple pendulum is not a perfect simple harmonic oscillator because its restoring force is not directly proportional to the angle of displacement, especially at larger angles. As the angle increases, the approximation of the restoring torque deviates from the ideal linear relationship. This leads to variations in the period of the pendulum, which can be better approximated using more complex formulas. In contrast, Christiaan Huygens's pendulum, which follows the tautochrone curve, maintains a constant period regardless of amplitude, qualifying it as a true simple harmonic oscillator. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for accurate physics modeling.
Huzaifa
Messages
40
Reaction score
2
Khan Academy claims that a simple pendulum not a perfect simple harmonic oscillator. Why is it so?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Huzaifa said:
Khan Academy claims that a simple pendulum not a perfect simple harmonic oscillator. Why is it so?
Is the restoring torque exactly proportional to the angle of the pendulum? What happens if the angle gets big?
 
Because the restoring force is not exactly (negatively) proportional to the displacement.
 
  • Like
Likes olgerm and vanhees71
Yes, the simple pendulum is not a simple harmonic oscillator for reasons already explained. However, Christiaan Huygens's pendulum follows the tautochrone curve which is not as simple as a circle but has amplitude-independent period, i.e. is a simple harmonic oscillator.
 
  • Like
Likes Dadface, vanhees71, DaveE and 2 others
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (First part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8 and stuck at some statements. It's little bit confused. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. Solution : The surface bound charge on the ##xy## plane is of opposite sign to ##q##, so the force will be...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
Back
Top