Why is Annihilation Not a Force?

In summary, annihilation is a force that occurs when two particles come into contact. It is an event caused by interactions of forces, and the process that happens at the very moment of the annihilation is part of the force.
  • #1
Islam Hassan
237
5
If no other force is responsible for annihilation, is it a force in itself? Does one always need a gauge boson in order to have a force? If so, can one consider that matter and antimatter are their own gauge bosons with annihilation?

IH
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
How can annihilation, which is some event, be a force?
 
  • #3
Can events arise that are not the result of a force?

IH
 
  • #4
Well, if you assume that two particles are approaching each other at certain velocities, for example an electron and a photon, they would collide. But not because of any kind of attraction, but because their trajectories simply crossed.
 
  • #5
I see; what is annihilation in that case? Can it be conceived as a selective and collective very high-energy decay? I'm having trouble understanding the concept itself...

IH
 
  • #6
I must admit that I'm not sure either. Maybe somebody else could provide some insights.
 
  • #7
if a particle and a anti- particle annihilate each other a gauge boson is realized. The rest mass of these two particles is converted into the energy of the gauge boson. Annihilation is a particular type of interaction that is generated by a force.
 
  • #8
It is caused by a force, yes. But the process that happens at the very moment of the annihilation? Is it correct to say that this is part of the force as well?
 
  • #9
Saying annihilation is a force is like saying beta decay is a force. It is not. It is an event caused by interactions of forces.
 
  • #10
Polyrhythmic said:
It is caused by a force, yes. But the process that happens at the very moment of the annihilation? Is it correct to say that this is part of the force as well?

I don't believe so. A force is:
In physics, a force is any influence that causes a free body to undergo a change in speed, a change in direction, or a change in shape.

The electromagnetic force causes the attraction between anti particles which leads to annihilation. The annihilation itself uses forces to convert the particles into other particles.
 
  • #11
pls learn some quantum fied theory to understand these things better.
the question of annhilation requires some simple qft.
 
  • #12
Drakkith said:
I don't believe so. A force is:
In physics, a force is any influence that causes a free body to undergo a change in speed, a change in direction, or a change in shape.

The electromagnetic force causes the attraction between anti particles which leads to annihilation. The annihilation itself uses forces to convert the particles into other particles.

So to summarise, a particle and its anti-particle are drawn together by the electromagnetic force and then annihilate themselves via other forces by the total conversion of mass into boatloads of massless gauge bosons. In that case the 'other forces' must be the strong force since weak force gauge bosons have mass.

Is this correct? And what about a neutrino + anti-neutrino annihilation? Surely they are not drawn together by the electromagnetic force...

IH
 
  • #13
All the 4 forces in nature have an atraction, so the particles can all be drawn together by it, or just happened to collide by accident (or on purpose in colliders).

And also massive gauge bosons can also be created, because it's a conversion into energy and that becomes gauge bosons and other particles. If no massive gauge bosons could be formed, they wouldn't have discovered the W's en Z boson.
 
  • #14
The mysterious process of magnetic reconnection annihilation may be one of the most important and ubiquitous processes in nature.
http://www.physorg.com/news115921245.html

During the proposed annihilation process which creates the giant magnetic bubbles at our heliosheath, cosmic rays may be either blocked, created or both.
http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-06-big-edge-solar.html
http://www.planetary.org/news/2011/0612_Voyager_Discovers_Possible_Sea_of_Huge.html

Respectfully submitted,
Steve
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #15
Islam Hassan said:
So to summarise, a particle and its anti-particle are drawn together by the electromagnetic force and then annihilate themselves via other forces by the total conversion of mass into boatloads of massless gauge bosons. In that case the 'other forces' must be the strong force since weak force gauge bosons have mass.

Is this correct? And what about a neutrino + anti-neutrino annihilation? Surely they are not drawn together by the electromagnetic force...

IH

I'm not sure honestly.
 
  • #16
Drakkith said:
I'm not sure honestly.

OK, I guess what I am trying to understand is whether annihilation is:

- Simply a nominal high-energy particle collision, except that it takes place between a particle and its anti-particle; or

- A very special type of high-energy particle collision where i) any and all particle mass is transformed 100% into non-massive high-energy particles streams and ii) the collision mechanism is different from normal high-energy collisions and/or is unique.

It's simply this thing that one keeps reading that annihilation converts both your particles into pure energy. Is it really accurate to say such a thing? In terms of %, how much mass is typically converted into massless gauge bosons in annihilation?

IH
 
  • #17
It doesn't have to be a high energy collision.
Also, depending on the particles that are annihilating you can have many different particles produced. Electron-positron commonly produce two photons, while proton-antiproton produces many different particles in addition to photons.
Ref: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proton_antiproton_annihilation
Ref: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electron–positron_annihilation
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #18
Drakkith said:
It doesn't have to be a high energy collision.
Also, depending on the particles that are annihilating you can have many different particles produced. Electron-positron commonly produce two photons, while proton-antiproton produces many different particles in addition to photons.
Ref: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proton_antiproton_annihilation
Ref: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electron–positron_annihilation

Ok, so annihilation is basically a particle collision, be high or low energy, between a particle and its anti-particle. There is nothing really special about it apart from that, be it the forces involved or the collisions products.

IH
 
Last edited by a moderator:

FAQ: Why is Annihilation Not a Force?

1. Why is annihilation not considered a force?

Annihilation is not considered a force because it does not involve an exchange of particles between two objects. Forces are typically described as interactions between two objects that result in a change in motion or position. Annihilation, on the other hand, involves the complete conversion of matter into energy.

2. Can annihilation be considered a force in certain situations?

In certain situations, annihilation can be considered a force. For example, in nuclear fusion reactions, the process of annihilation between particles can create a strong force that holds the nucleus of an atom together. However, this force is not considered a fundamental force like gravity or electromagnetism.

3. Why is annihilation often referred to as a reaction rather than a force?

Annihilation is often referred to as a reaction because it involves the transformation of matter into energy, rather than a physical force acting on an object. It is a process that occurs between particles, rather than an interaction between objects.

4. Is annihilation a destructive force?

In a sense, annihilation can be considered a destructive force because it results in the complete destruction of matter. However, it is not a force in the traditional sense, as it does not act on objects to cause a change in motion or position.

5. How does annihilation differ from other forces?

Annihilation differs from other forces in several ways. Firstly, it is not a fundamental force like gravity or electromagnetism. Secondly, it does not act on objects to cause a change in motion or position, but instead involves the complete conversion of matter into energy. Lastly, it is a process that occurs between particles, rather than an interaction between objects.

Similar threads

Back
Top