Why Is Carbon-12 Emission from Radium-226 Highly Unlikely?

In summary, alpha decay and 12C emission are two types of radioactive decay that differ in the particles emitted. Alpha decay is more common, as alpha particles are more stable and easier to emit. In alpha decay, the mass and atomic number decrease by 4 and 2, respectively, while in 12C emission, they decrease by 12 and 6. Alpha decay releases more energy in a concentrated form, making it more powerful than 12C emission. Both types of decay can make an atom more stable by reducing its mass and atomic number, but multiple decays can eventually lead to a stable state.
  • #1
xiMy
10
0

Homework Statement


Radium 226 usually decays via three consecutive alpha decays into Pb 214. Show that energetically possibly for radium 226 to decay into 214|86 Pb and 12|6 C but tell why it is highly unlikely.
Calculate the lifetime of the direct transition as a function of the possibility [itex]\omega[/itex] for the 12C to be assembled in the nuclear parent.
Hint: lifetime universe : 1.4 10^10 a

Homework Equations


gamow factor - alpha decay
fermis golden rule - decay width
we calculated the one particle into two decay which is
[itex]\Gamma=\frac{\vec{p_2}}{32 \pi^2 m_a^2} \int{|M^2| d\Omega}[/itex]
but I have absolutely no idea how to get the M

The Attempt at a Solution


I have no idea how to approach this. I can show via the Weizsäcker mass formula that the reaction is energetically possible (funny fact: the alpha decay isn't because the formula calculates the mass for the alpha particle too heavy 4.0071 u instead of 4.0026; 12C is also 12.0026 instead of just 12 - so while its pretty good formula it is actually not good enough) but from then on I am clueless.

The gamov factor is usually derived for the alpha decay. Can I just take the same [itex]G=\int_R^{r_E}dr\frac{\sqrt{2m_{\alpha}(E-V(r))}d}{\hbar}[/itex] for 12C and then compare the values because they are proportionally to squareroot E ?
That would be 15 MeV for 12C vs 4 MeV and the formula is [itex]\lambda \propto e^{-2G}[/itex]
Problem is that the radii for the alpha particle and C are different and therefore the potentials V too. Is the problem really that complicated or am I missing something?
Anyway, I really would appreciate the help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
. Thank you!

Thank you for your post. It is indeed possible for radium 226 to decay into 214|86 Pb and 12|6 C, but as you mentioned, it is highly unlikely. This is due to the difference in energy between the two decay paths.

To calculate the lifetime of the direct transition, we can use the Fermi's golden rule for decay width. This formula is given by:

Γ = 2π|M|^2ρ(E)

where Γ is the decay width, M is the transition matrix element, and ρ(E) is the density of final states.

In this case, we are interested in the transition from radium 226 to 12|6 C and 214|86 Pb. The transition matrix element can be calculated using the formula you provided in your post, but it will be different for each decay path due to the difference in radii and potentials.

The density of final states, ρ(E), can be calculated using the formula:

ρ(E) = \frac{1}{2π^2\hbar^3}\int_0^{r_E}\sqrt{2m(E-V(r))}r^2dr

where r_E is the radius of the nucleus and V(r) is the potential at that radius.

Once you have calculated the decay widths for both decay paths, you can use the relation:

\omega = \frac{\Gamma_{12C}}{\Gamma_{214 Pb + 12C}}

to determine the probability of the direct transition to occur. The lifetime of the direct transition can then be calculated using the relation:

τ = \frac{1}{\Gamma} = \frac{1}{\Gamma_{12C} + \Gamma_{214 Pb + 12C}}

Using these calculations, you can determine the lifetime of the direct transition as a function of the possibility ω for the 12C to be assembled in the nuclear parent.

I hope this helps. Please let me know if you have any further questions or need clarification on any of the steps. Best of luck with your research!
 

FAQ: Why Is Carbon-12 Emission from Radium-226 Highly Unlikely?

What is the difference between alpha decay and 12C emission?

Alpha decay and 12C emission are both types of radioactive decay, but they differ in the particles that are emitted. In alpha decay, an alpha particle (two protons and two neutrons) is emitted from the nucleus of an atom. In 12C emission, a carbon-12 nucleus is emitted from the nucleus of an atom.

Which type of decay is more common, alpha decay or 12C emission?

Alpha decay is more common than 12C emission. This is because alpha particles are more stable and have a higher binding energy than carbon-12 nuclei, making them easier to emit from a nucleus. Additionally, there are more elements that undergo alpha decay compared to those that undergo 12C emission.

How does the mass and atomic number change in alpha decay compared to 12C emission?

In alpha decay, the mass number decreases by 4 and the atomic number decreases by 2. This is because an alpha particle, which has a mass number of 4 and an atomic number of 2, is emitted from the nucleus. On the other hand, in 12C emission, the mass number decreases by 12 and the atomic number decreases by 6, as a carbon-12 nucleus is emitted from the nucleus.

What are the energy differences between alpha decay and 12C emission?

Alpha decay releases more energy than 12C emission. This is because alpha particles have a higher mass and can carry more energy than carbon-12 nuclei. The energy released in alpha decay is also more concentrated, as it is released in one particle, while in 12C emission, the energy is spread out over multiple particles.

How do alpha decay and 12C emission affect the stability of an atom?

Both alpha decay and 12C emission can make an atom more stable. This is because they reduce the mass and atomic number of the nucleus, making it less likely to undergo further decay. However, if an unstable nucleus undergoes multiple decays, it can eventually reach a stable state.

Similar threads

Back
Top