Why is it path integral formalism being a ''quantization'' procedure?

In summary, while the integration is the ''summing up'' procedure,quantization is converting a classical theory into a quantum theory.
  • #1
ndung200790
519
0
Please teach me this:
I do not understand why we call functional integral procedure in QFT being ''quantization'' procedure.Because the integration is the ''summing up'' procedure,but not ''dividing'' into ''quantum'' procedure.Or does this term(quantization) has a origin of being able to deduce Feynman diagrams from functional integral formalism?By the way,does it in the nonperturbative QFT we still use Feynman diagrams?
Thank you very much for your kind helping.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I hear that path integral is also used in Quantum Gravity,so it is a powerful tool for quantization
procedure.Then where is the quantizing meaning with the ''integral''?
 
  • #3
Quantising just means converting a classical theory into a quantum theory, nothing to do with dividing things up into pieces or anything like. So the path integral formalism quantises a theory because it turns it into a quantum theory.

In nonperturbative QFT you do not use Feynman diagrams.
 
  • #4
Quantum Mechanics is a dual particle-wave theory,but path integral formalism has only wave feature.So I do not understand why Path Integral Formalism changes Classical Mechanics into Quantum Mechanics?
 
  • #5
Quantum Mechanics is not a theory of waves or particles, nor of a duality between them, it is a theory of dynamical systems which provides the correct description of matter behavior at length-scales of 1 nanometer or less, if gravity effects are excluded. Matter can be seen as waves (quantum mechanical theory of light, for example) and/or particles (electrons in atoms, for example), but this distinction is lost, because it effectively pertains to classical/non-quantum mechanics.

Path integrals are mathematical means to a quicker computation of probability amplitudes/densities, which are key ingredients in quantum mechanics. So path integrals are part of quantum mechanics, if one decides to use them (I don't know of a classical theory such as GR which uses path integrals.)
 
  • #6
So,in Quantum Gravity Theory,we need not ''make'' the discrete space-time ''atoms'',but needing to build a theory of space-time at ''tiny'' scale?How about the trying in Gravitons?
 
  • #7
quantization never means to discretize something by hand; the discretization is always emergent
 

FAQ: Why is it path integral formalism being a ''quantization'' procedure?

1. What is the path integral formalism?

The path integral formalism is a mathematical framework used to describe quantum systems. It involves calculating the probability amplitude for a particle to travel from one point to another by summing over all possible paths that the particle could take.

2. How does the path integral formalism differ from other quantization procedures?

The path integral formalism differs from other quantization procedures, such as the canonical quantization, in that it does not rely on operators and wavefunctions. Instead, it uses a functional integral approach and treats time as a continuous variable.

3. Why is the path integral formalism considered a "quantization" procedure?

The path integral formalism is considered a quantization procedure because it allows for the description of quantum systems in terms of classical variables, such as position and momentum. It also allows for the calculation of quantum mechanical quantities, such as transition amplitudes and correlation functions.

4. What are the advantages of using the path integral formalism?

The path integral formalism has several advantages, including its intuitive interpretation of quantum mechanics, its ability to handle complex systems with many degrees of freedom, and its connection to statistical mechanics. It also allows for the incorporation of interactions and non-perturbative effects.

5. Are there any limitations or drawbacks to using the path integral formalism?

One limitation of the path integral formalism is that it can be mathematically challenging to apply in certain cases, such as systems with infinite-dimensional configuration spaces. It also has difficulty dealing with systems that violate unitarity, such as those with non-Hermitian Hamiltonians. Additionally, the path integral may not always converge, leading to difficulties in calculations.

Similar threads

Back
Top