Why Is ln(1+x) Greater Than x/(2+x) for x > 0?

  • MHB
  • Thread starter Lisa91
  • Start date
In summary, "Proving ln(1+x) > x/(2+x): A Guide" is a step-by-step explanation of how to prove the inequality for all values of x greater than or equal to 0. This inequality is important in calculus and understanding logarithmic and exponential functions. The key steps in the proof involve using the definition of the natural logarithm, simplifying the expression, and using properties of inequalities. The proof assumes x is a real number greater than or equal to 0 and uses properties of logarithms and inequalities. There are other methods that can be used to prove this inequality.
  • #1
Lisa91
29
0
How to prove that for [tex] x>0 [/tex]
[tex] \ln(1+x) > \frac{x}{2+x} [/tex] is true?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Lisa91 said:
How to prove that for [tex] x>0 [/tex]
[tex] \ln(1+x) > \frac{x}{2+x} [/tex] is true?

Yes, it is true. One way to prove it: denote, $f(x)=\ln(1+x) - \dfrac{x}{2+x}$, then $f'(x)=\ldots=\dfrac{x^2+2x+2}{(1+x)(2+x)^2}>0$ for all $x>0$. This means that $f$ is strictly increasing in $(0,+\infty)$. On the other hand,

$\displaystyle\lim_{x\to 0^+}f(x)=\displaystyle\lim_{x\to 0^+}\left(x+o(x)-\frac{x}{2+x}\right)=0$.
 

FAQ: Why Is ln(1+x) Greater Than x/(2+x) for x > 0?

What is the purpose of "Proving ln(1+x) > x/(2+x): A Guide?"

The purpose of this guide is to provide a step-by-step explanation of how to prove the inequality ln(1+x) > x/(2+x) for all values of x greater than or equal to 0. This inequality is commonly used in calculus and other areas of mathematics.

Why is proving ln(1+x) > x/(2+x) important?

This inequality is important because it is a useful tool in calculus and can be used to prove other important results. It also helps to understand the behavior of logarithmic and exponential functions.

What are the key steps in proving ln(1+x) > x/(2+x)?

The key steps in proving ln(1+x) > x/(2+x) include using the definition of the natural logarithm, simplifying the expression using algebraic manipulation, and using properties of inequalities such as the transitive property and the fact that ln(x) is an increasing function for positive x.

What are the assumptions made in the proof of ln(1+x) > x/(2+x)?

The proof assumes that x is a real number greater than or equal to 0. It also uses the properties of logarithms and inequalities without explicitly stating them.

Can this inequality be proven using other methods?

Yes, there are multiple ways to prove this inequality. This guide provides one possible method, but there may be other approaches that use different mathematical techniques.

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
880
Replies
6
Views
432
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top