- #36
dontdisturbmycircles
- 592
- 3
Sorry to repost, but I meant the slope of the tangent line.
My bad.
Last edited:
Im kinda interested to know what you're talking about...gravenewworld said:The topology trick with the strip of paper where you twist it 180, 360, and 540 degrees then cut it down the middle to get different results. that was totally mind blowing.
Like the Möbius strip?gravenewworld said:The topology trick with the strip of paper where you twist it 180, 360, and 540 degrees then cut it down the middle to get different results. that was totally mind blowing.
Like the Möbius strip?
Im kinda interested to know what you're talking about...
That's so ... mind blowing.mathwonk said:as a kid, i waS READING A DONALD DUCK COMIC BOOK AND HE haD THE IDEA TO GET RICH from a double your money back offer. a store offered double money back if a hair restorer failed to work. he figured he could not grow hair, being a duck, and remarked that if he doubled a dollar 20 times he'd be a millionaire. i checked and he was right. i was amazed.
of course he lost. he took the stuff back for his first or second refund and the guy ridiculed him and rubbed the hair grow tonic all over his body and kicked him out. a day later he popped out in hair all over and had to pay double to get the hair remover.
Guillochon said:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graham%27s_number" , which is so big that it has its own special notation.
Beautiful, yet creepy. What exactly is it?turbo-1 said:Graphical representations of the intersection between real and imaginary numbers are not only mind-blowing, but can be beautiful, or even creepy. Here is a plate of alien fried eggs. I've got dozens and dozens of images - all different, and many of which took hours to construct.
http://img299.imageshack.us/img299/2563/eggsye2.jpg
It is an image that I created with Fractal Magic. You get full control over layers, colors, transparency, etc. There is a HUGE learning curve, but it can be worth it. Here is another one that should appeal to the sisterhood. I chose the colors because they looked like octopi/squid colors, and there are some artifacts (seahorses) that look more like traditional Mandelbrot images.Evo said:Beautiful, yet creepy. What exactly is it?
Wow, post more!turbo-1 said:It is an image that I created with Fractal Magic. You get full control over layers, colors, transparency, etc. There is a HUGE learning curve, but it can be worth it. Here is another one that should appeal to the sisterhood. I chose the colors because they looked like octopi/squid colors, and there are some artifacts (seahorses) that look more like traditional Mandelbrot images.
http://img299.imageshack.us/img299/2779/squidglowch7.jpg
That is the "magic". You get to apply symmetries, inversions, etc to make your images. Most of the horsepower comes from choosing which functions you want to apply in each layer, where to set the transparency limits and how to implement those, and what color schemes and gradients to apply. You can of course recover Mandelbrot and Julia sets in their original iterations and make beautiful images playing with only palettes and gradation slopes, etc, but that is not really satisfying. As I noted in another post recently, my "take" on creativity has a decidedly technical bent.DaveC426913 said:As someone who played with Mandelbrot and Julia set generators for a while, I'd say some of those shapes don't look like bona fide fractal constructs - notably the left and right edges of the image.
Is Fractal Magic taking some "liberties" with its designs?
0rthodontist said:Getting my first rough inkling of the incredible size of the field of math.
Not wishing to cast aspersions upon these quite beautful works, but it seems to me, the real charm of Mandelbrot set and Julia sets is that they are entirely natural. This seems like the gilding of a pretty incredible lily.turbo-1 said:That is the "magic". You get to apply symmetries, inversions, etc to make your images. Most of the horsepower comes from choosing which functions you want to apply in each layer, where to set the transparency limits and how to implement those, and what color schemes and gradients to apply. You can of course recover Mandelbrot and Julia sets in their original iterations and make beautiful images playing with only palettes and gradation slopes, etc, but that is not really satisfying. As I noted in another post recently, my "take" on creativity has a decidedly technical bent.