Why is Normal Force Negative in this situation?

In summary: Personally I prefer to write the equations in the form...A + B + C = 0rather than..A + B = CIn summary, the physics of circular motion sets an upper limit to the speed of human walking. If you take a few steps and watch what's happening, you'll see that your body pivots in circular motion over your forward foot as you bring your rear foot forward for the next step. As you do so, the normal force of the ground on your foot decreases and your body tries to "lift off" from the ground.
  • #1
soccer123
5
0

Homework Statement


The physics of circular motion sets an upper limit to the speed of human walking. (If you need to go faster, your gait changes from a walk to a run.) If you take a few steps and watch what's happening, you'll see that your body pivots in circular motion over your forward foot as you bring your rear foot forward for the next step. As you do so, the normal force of the ground on your foot decreases and your body tries to "lift off" from the ground.
(a)
. A person's center of mass is very near the hips, at the top of the legs. Model a person as a particle of mass m at the top of a leg of length L.Find an expression for the person's maximum walking speed vmax.
Express your answer in terms of the variables L and appropriate constants.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Now I have the solution, which is reached in the following way:

mg - N = (mV^2)/r
N = 0 at Vmax. Also, let r = L.
mg = (mV^2)/L
Vmax = sqrt(Lg) = Answer. Now what I don't understand is why is it mg - N, rather than N - mg, seeing as how mg is pointing down and N is pointing up?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
You haven't actually defined up or down as positive in your answer.

However it appear you have chosen downwards as positive because you wrote +mg rather than -mg.
 
  • #3
CWatters said:
You haven't actually defined up or down as positive in your answer.

However it appear you have chosen downwards as positive because you wrote +mg rather than -mg.

The problem is if you define negative as down, then the following will occur: N - mg = (mV^2)/L ----> Vmax = sqrt(-gL). This does not seem plausible given that you can't square root a negative number.
 
  • #4
You have to take into account the direction of the acceleration. Acceleration is a vector too.
 
  • #5
The problem is if you define negative as down, then the following will occur: N - mg = (mV^2)/L ----> Vmax = sqrt(-gL). This does not seem plausible given that you can't square root a negative number.

What about the sign of (mV^2)/L ? If you change the definition of +ve then the sign of the centripetal/centrifugal force must also change.

Personally I prefer to write the equations in the form...

A + B + C = 0

rather than..

A + B = C

That way you are forced to think about the sign of all the forces.
 

Related to Why is Normal Force Negative in this situation?

1. Why is the normal force negative in this situation?

The normal force is a type of reaction force that acts perpendicular to the surface of an object. In some situations, when an object is placed on a surface, the normal force can be negative. This happens when the object is in a state of equilibrium, meaning that all the forces acting on it cancel out and there is no net force. In this case, the normal force is negative because it is acting in the opposite direction of the force that is causing the object to be in equilibrium.

2. Is a negative normal force possible?

Yes, a negative normal force is possible in certain situations. As mentioned before, this occurs when an object is in a state of equilibrium and the normal force is acting in the opposite direction of the force that is keeping the object in equilibrium. It is important to note that the magnitude of the normal force can never be negative, only its direction.

3. How does a negative normal force affect an object?

A negative normal force does not have any direct effect on the object itself. It is simply a way of representing the direction of the force acting on the object. The object will still remain in equilibrium as long as the forces acting on it cancel out.

4. Can the normal force ever be zero?

Yes, the normal force can be zero in certain situations. This occurs when an object is not in contact with a surface and therefore there is no surface for the normal force to act upon. For example, if you hold a book in your hand without placing it on a table, the normal force acting on the book would be zero.

5. How is the normal force related to weight?

The normal force and weight are two different types of forces that act on an object. The normal force is the force exerted by a surface on an object, while weight is the force of gravity acting on an object's mass. In some situations, the normal force may be equal and opposite to the weight, which allows an object to remain in equilibrium. However, in other situations, the normal force and weight may not be equal, resulting in a net force and causing the object to accelerate.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
3
Replies
95
Views
4K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
587
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top