Why Is Porn Spam So Hard to Avoid?

  • Thread starter Loren Booda
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Hard
In summary: LorenIt was you who sent those spam equations, Math is Hard? I believe most couples who experiment with pornography together find it a turn-off compared to what God gave them. - Warren
  • #36
franznietzsche said:
You'd be surprised how many don't react negatively.

You'd be horrified when you saw all the negative reactions. Kill 'em all.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #37
Moonbear said:
True. I think most of the women I know realize this is just something men do, and don't really care one way or the other. Most of the rest would want to view it with them, or would use it as incentive to see how far they need to go to distract their man from viewing. Only a handful are upset by this...not surprisingly, their men are usually the ones who are viewing porn secretly to substitute for what they aren't getting in other ways.

Yes, they have given up, got used to it, and they don't think there is any cure for it. Men = beasts.
 
  • #38
Les Sleeth said:
Some of the varieties of sexual play, especially that which can develop over time as a relationship matures, might appear obscene to some...

Particularly and only when it is forced up in others' faces.
 
  • #39
Thallium said:
Particularly and only when it is forced up in others' faces.

True, I really dislike all spam, and especially porno spam. So intrusive! I got off subject a little over someone talking about a woman acting "slutty." My impression was that he saw certain sexual behaviors as morally wrong. I believe a lot of sexual problems (especially in the US) have been needlessly caused by the shaming of sex. While porn might not be the best way to fix it, maybe it is something people are using to help shake off some that shame.
 
  • #40
Les Sleeth said:
. While porn might not be the best way to fix it, maybe it is something people are using to help shake off some that shame.
Well, I use it to shake off something. Wouldn't call it shame though.
 
  • #41
Loren Booda said:
It was you who sent those spam equations, Math is Hard? In my first days at Yale I saw in a bathroom stall an equation like "the integral of e to the x equals the function of u sub n"? It still haunts me. So much for freshman sex.
so THAT's what that means! I get it now! :smile:
 
  • #42
This is the version that resides on a wall in a men's room in my dept.
[tex]\int e^x = e^x + C [/tex]

written to read like sex = ex + C
 
  • #43
What's C supposed to be?

- Warren
 
  • #44
Gokul43201 said:
This is the version that resides on a wall in a men's room in my dept.
[tex]\int e^x = e^x + C [/tex]

written to read like sex = ex + C

Okay, I had to stare at this one for a very long time. Is ex+C supposed to be read "ecstasy?" Are you supposed to read the + as a t?
 
  • #45
chroot said:
What's C supposed to be?

- Warren

I guess it would have to be zero.


(nevermind - I think I just said something stupid. I was dazzled by the shiny new logo.)
 
Last edited:
  • #46
I'm merely reporting what I see...but my best guess was that 'ex' refers to an ex-wife/ex-gf/etc and 'C' was possibly an offspring, as in child.

No humor in that, eh ? Oh well...

Moonbear, I like the "ecstasy" interpretation.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top