Why is the boundary of the rationals (Q) equal to R?

  • Thread starter filter54321
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Boundary
In summary, The reading discusses the boundary of a set and how it is equal to the first boundary for subsets of R1 and R2. However, it states that the boundary of the rationals Q is R, which may seem incorrect. The reason for this is that every point in Q is also a boundary point, but so are all points in R\Q because every irrational number has rationals arbitrarily close to it. This example may seem confusing, but it serves as a good example for various mathematical concepts.
  • #1
filter54321
39
0
I was reading a website that said the boundary of a set's boundary is equal to the first boundary. Visually, this makes sense for subsets of R1 and R2 because the first boundary will not have an interior (no ball about the points will fall into the boundary).

However, the reading went on to say that the boundary of the rationals Q is R. This seems wrong to me so I am questioning the entire site.

Wouldn't the boundary of Q be Q? A ball of positive radius about any point in Q would contain both points from Q as well as irrationals from P. ddQ = dQ = Q (where d is boundary operator). The theorem at top does appear to hold but the example is messed up...no?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
If A is a subset of R^n, then a boundary point of A is, by definition, a point x of R^n such that every open ball about x contains both points of A and of R^n\A.

So for instance, in the case of A=Q, yes, every point of Q is a boundary point, but also every point of R\Q because every irrational admits rationals arbitrarily close to it. So in the end, dQ=R.
 
  • #3
The rationals in the reals are good for all kinds of examples and counterexamples.

Here's a cool one: there is a proper open subset [tex]U\subset\mathbb{R}[/tex] with [tex]\mathbb{Q}\subset U[/tex]. That is, U is open and contains all of Q, but not all of R.
 
  • #4
Isn't it obvious? Take U=R minus any irrational point.
 
  • #5


I would like to clarify that the boundary of a set is defined as the set of points that are both inside and outside of the given set. In other words, it is the set of points where the set "ends" and the outside space "begins".

In the case of the set of rational numbers (Q), the boundary is indeed equal to Q. This is because every rational number has both rational and irrational numbers on either side of it, making it a point on the boundary. Therefore, a ball of positive radius around any point in Q will contain both rational and irrational numbers, and thus the boundary is equal to Q.

The statement on the website that the boundary of Q is R is incorrect. The set of real numbers (R) includes both rational and irrational numbers, but it is not the same as the boundary of Q. It is important to note that the boundary of a set is not necessarily equal to the set itself.

In conclusion, the boundary of the rationals (Q) is equal to Q, not R. As a scientist, it is important to critically evaluate information and question sources that may not be accurate.
 

FAQ: Why is the boundary of the rationals (Q) equal to R?

Why is the boundary of the rationals (Q) equal to R?

The boundary of the rationals (Q) is equal to the set of all real numbers (R) because the set of rational numbers is dense in the real numbers. This means that between any two real numbers, there exists a rational number. Therefore, the boundary of the rationals (Q) is equal to R, as it encompasses all the gaps between the rational numbers.

How is the boundary of the rationals (Q) defined?

The boundary of the rationals (Q) is defined as the set of all real numbers (R) that are not part of the set of rational numbers. In other words, it is the set of irrational numbers that cannot be expressed as a ratio of two integers.

What is the significance of the boundary of the rationals (Q) being equal to R?

The equality of the boundary of the rationals (Q) and the set of real numbers (R) has important implications in mathematical analysis and the study of limits. It allows for the concept of continuity, where a function is continuous at a point if and only if the limit of the function at that point is equal to the function's value at that point. This concept is crucial in various fields of science and engineering.

Can the boundary of the rationals (Q) be visualized?

While it is not possible to visualize the entire boundary of the rationals (Q), certain subsets of the boundary can be visualized. For example, the set of irrational numbers between 0 and 1 can be represented on a number line as a dense set of points, with no gaps between them. This illustrates the density of the rational numbers in the real numbers.

How does the boundary of the rationals (Q) relate to the concept of infinity?

The boundary of the rationals (Q) is an infinite set, as it contains an infinite number of irrational numbers. This is because there are infinitely many irrational numbers between any two rational numbers. The concept of infinity is also often used in the study of limits and continuity, as it allows for the consideration of infinitely small and infinitely large values.

Back
Top