Why is the Heat equation solved with separation of variables but not with Fourier transformations?

In summary, the Heat equation is often solved using separation of variables because this method directly breaks down the equation into simpler, solvable parts that can be handled analytically. Separation of variables allows for straightforward boundary and initial condition applications. In contrast, while Fourier transformations are powerful for solving linear partial differential equations, they often involve more complex manipulations and assumptions regarding the function's behavior at infinity, making them less practical for certain scenarios, particularly with non-homogeneous or time-dependent boundary conditions.
  • #1
yaman
1
0
How did you find PF?: Years ago online forums were more visible. These days they are left behind social media. I searched Google and now I am here.

Why in heat transfer books Fourier's partial differtial unsteady state heat transfer equation is solved with seperation of variables but not with Fourier transformations?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Hello and :welcome:!

Have fun and stay curious!

Moderator's Note: I moved this into a technical forum. The "New member introduction" forum is only meant to say 'hello'.
 
  • #3
yaman said:
Why in heat transfer books Fourier's partial differtial unsteady state heat transfer equation is solved with seperation of variables but not with Fourier transformations?

Have you tried solving it on a finite interval subject to initial and boundary conditions (the typical geometry appropriate for separation of variables) using a transform method? Is that easier or harder than separation of variables?
 
  • #4
yaman said:
Why in heat transfer books Fourier's partial differtial unsteady state heat transfer equation is solved with seperation of variables but not with Fourier transformations?
This is simply incorrect. The method applied will generally depend on the domain. An infinite domain will be suited for transforms such as the Fourier transform, whereas a finite domain will be more suited for series expansions. Both methods are effectively the same and amount to separation of variables.

I know at least one textbook that uses Fourier transforms to solve the heat equation (and series expansion on finite domains). I know this because I wrote it.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman and hutchphd
Back
Top