Why is the integral of ##\arcsin(\sin(x))## so divisive?

In summary, the conversation discusses the process of finding the function for the area between ##\arcsin(\sin(x))## and the ##x##-axis, specifically the definite integral ##\int_{0}^{x} \arcsin(\sin(t)) dt##. The individual attempts to find the antiderivative using WolframAlpha and Symbolab and the confusion and disagreement surrounding the result. It is eventually concluded that the integral can be expressed in a piecewise manner and that it is helpful to reduce ##x## to the interval ##[0, 2\pi]##.
  • #1
Saracen Rue
150
10
TL;DR Summary
Various sources give different answers to ##\arcsin(\sin(x))##, and none of them seem to actually be fully correct. Why is this the case, and is there an actual answer?
Initially, I was attempting to find the function which expresses the area under enclosed between the function ##\arcsin(\sin(x))## and the ##x##-axis (so technically I am looking for ##\int_{0}^{x} \arcsin(\sin(t)) dt## specifically, but got caught up on finding the general antiderivative).

This lead me to attempting to integrate ##\arcsin(\sin(x))## using WolframAlpha, which gave me ##x\arcsin\left(\sin\left(x\right)\right)-\frac{x^{2}}{2}\sec\left(x\right)\sqrt{\cos^{2}\left(x\right)}##. After a quick inspection of the function, it became clear that something just wasn't quite right. So, I graphed it against ##\arcsin(\sin(x))## and quickly saw that, which being accurate for the domain ##(-\frac{\pi}{2}, \frac{\pi}{2})##, it wasn't at all accurate outside of that domain. I next used Symbolab to attempt to evaluate ##\int \arcsin(\sin(x)) dx## and it gave me the result ##\frac{\arcsin\left(\sin\left(x\right)\right)^{2}}{2}##. Again, this seems to be correct for the domain ##(-\frac{\pi}{2}, \frac{\pi}{2})##, but not for ##(\frac{\pi}{2}, \frac{3\pi}{2})##... but then it is correct for ##(\frac{3\pi}{2}, \frac{5\pi}{2})## but not for ##(\frac{5\pi}{2}, \frac{7\pi}{2})## and so on.

Honestly, this has kind of left me stumped. I tried watching several Youtube videos but they all either have one of the answers above or are just completely wrong in their entirety. Why is it that no one can seem to agree on what this indefinite integral should be? I can understand if there's no way to fully express it in terms of elementary functions, but why not say that? WolframAlpha and Symbolab will both say there's no standard solution for integrating something like ##x^x##, so why do they both confidently give incorrect or at very least only partially correct answers to this integral? At the very least they should tell you that the antiderivative is only valid over a certain domain.

Finally, if anyone can find a way to evaluate ##\int_{0}^{x} \arcsin(\sin(t)) dt## it would be greatly appreciated! Thank you for your time.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Saracen Rue said:
Finally, if anyone can find a way to evaluate ##\int_{0}^{x} \arcsin(\sin(t)) dt## it would be greatly appreciated! Thank you for your time.
I don't understand your issue. Isn't ##\arcsin\left(\sin\left(t\right)\right)\equiv\sin^{-1}\left(\sin(t)\right)=t+2n\pi## (where ##n=0,\pm1,\pm2,\ldots##)? So doesn't your integral simply evaluate to ##\frac{1}{2}x^{2}+2n\pi x##? (Note that for ##n=0##, that's precisely the answer returned by both Wolfram Alpha and Symbolab.)
 
  • #3
renormalize said:
I don't understand your issue. Isn't ##\arcsin\left(\sin\left(t\right)\right)\equiv\sin^{-1}\left(\sin(t)\right)=t+2n\pi## (where ##n=0,\pm1,\pm2,\ldots##)? So doesn't your integral simply evaluate to ##\frac{1}{2}x^{2}+2n\pi x##? (Note that for ##n=0##, that's precisely the answer returned by both Wolfram Alpha and Symbolab.)
The ##\arcsin## function gives a value in the range ##[-\frac \pi 2, \frac \pi 2]##. So:

For ##0 \le t \le \frac \pi 2##, we have ##\arcsin(\sin t) = t##

For ##\frac \pi 2 \le t \le \frac {3\pi} 2##, we have ##\arcsin(\sin t) = \pi - t##

For ##\frac {3\pi} 2 \le t \le \frac {5\pi} 2##, we have ##\arcsin(\sin t) = t - 2\pi##

This is a sawtooth function, with period ##2\pi##.

It's not clear how you would describe the integral in terms of a single expression. The Wolfram answer works in each separate interval, but it's not going to work over the whole domain.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71, Saracen Rue and Ibix
  • #4
Saracen Rue said:
Finally, if anyone can find a way to evaluate ##\int_{0}^{x} \arcsin(\sin(t)) dt## it would be greatly appreciated! Thank you for your time.
The simplest approach is to reduce ##x## to the interval ##[0, 2\pi]##. The integral is the same for any ##x + 2n\pi##. Then $$\int_{0}^{x} \arcsin(\sin(t)) dt = $$$$\frac{x^2}{2} \ (0 \le x \le \frac \pi 2)$$$$\pi x - \frac{x^2}{2} - \frac{\pi^2}{4} \ (\frac \pi 2 \le x \le \frac {3\pi} 2)$$$$\frac{x^2}{2} - 2\pi x +2\pi^2 \ (\frac {3\pi} 2 \le x \le 2\pi)$$
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71

FAQ: Why is the integral of ##\arcsin(\sin(x))## so divisive?

1. What is the integral of arcsin(sin(x))?

The integral of arcsin(sin(x)) is not straightforward due to the periodic nature of the sine function and the properties of the arcsine function. The integral can be expressed as a piecewise function depending on the intervals of x, typically involving the absolute value function to account for the different ranges of arcsin.

2. Why is the behavior of arcsin(sin(x)) considered divisive?

The divisiveness arises from the fact that arcsin(sin(x)) does not yield a simple function for all x. Instead, it can produce different outputs depending on the value of x, leading to confusion and debate among mathematicians and students about how to handle the integration across different intervals.

3. What are the key challenges in integrating arcsin(sin(x))?

Key challenges include handling the discontinuities and periodicity of the sine function, as well as the restricted range of the arcsine function. This requires careful consideration of the intervals in which x lies and the corresponding outputs of the arcsin function, making the integration process more complex.

4. How can one approach the integral of arcsin(sin(x))?

One approach is to break the integral into segments based on the periodicity of the sine function and the range of the arcsine function. By evaluating the integral piecewise over these segments, one can derive a more manageable expression that accounts for the different behaviors of the function.

5. Are there any practical applications of this integral?

While the integral of arcsin(sin(x)) may not have direct applications, understanding its properties can deepen insights into trigonometric integrals, piecewise functions, and their behaviors in calculus. This knowledge can be beneficial in fields such as engineering, physics, and computer graphics, where wave functions and periodic phenomena are common.

Similar threads

Back
Top