Why is the math behind finger landing on a certain square related to parity?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Qu3ry
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of parity in relation to movement on a grid. It explains that starting from a specific square allows access to other squares in either even or odd moves, establishing a pattern. For instance, returning to the "Start" square requires an even number of moves, while an initial move is odd, making it impossible to land back on "Start" after one step. This understanding enables the elimination of certain squares, narrowing down possible landing options. The relationship between parity and movement significantly influences strategic decisions in the game.
Qu3ry
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
http://technology.todaysbigthing.com/2009/10/08

Can anyone prove that why your finger must be landed on that square?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It's a matter of "parity". Starting from a given square, you can reach some of the squares only in an even number of moves and the others only in an odd number of moves. For example, starting on the "Start" square you could only get back to it by an even number of moves. Since he requires you to make an odd number of moves first, he knows you cannot be on the "Start" square after the first step and so can remove that one. By forcing you to make an even or odd number of moves (the exact number is not relevant) he knows which squares he can remove and so reduces you possible moves.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top