Why is the same force drawn twice in the FBD for member AC?

  • Thread starter wahaj
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Force
In summary, the book says that there is a horizontal force in the FBD of the BC member, and that this force is equal to the tension in the string. The rod AC also contributes a force, which is equal to the tension in the string.
  • #1
wahaj
156
2

Homework Statement



Find reaction at A and B. A,B,C are pin joints with a pulley at C. There is a weight hanging from the pulley which is attached just above the joint at D.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



This question can be solved by observation. there are two forces acting on the frame at C. A horizontal and vertical force of the same magnitude which is the tension in the string. BC is a two force member. The FBD is attached. From it I can determine that the reaction at B is tension in the string. member AC has two forces acting on it which are the two different directions of tension in the string. So the weight and the same horizontal force as the force acting on BC. So to conclude the reactions at A and B are of the same magnitude as the weight. But the book draws the horizontal tension in the string twice in the FBD for member AC which results in the horizontal reaction at A being twice as large as what I got. Why does the horizontal force C show up twice?
 

Attachments

  • 20121127_224015.jpg
    20121127_224015.jpg
    19.6 KB · Views: 438
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
wahaj said:
I can determine that the reaction at B is tension in the string.
Total reaction or horizontal component thereof? The horizontal components of reaction at A and B will add up to string tension, no?
 
  • #3
Before spinning wheels on this, you should correct your sketches to show the joint designations A and B consistently. And dimensions?
 
  • #4
I suppose providing numbers would be best. I didn't do that because I want to do my homework my self. I'm just having trouble with the concept. I didn't see this before but I labeled things wrong. Thanks for pointing that out. I'll correct that and provide a more mathematical version of my question. Sorry if I confused you. Ok so here is what I am having trouble with. at point C in the BC member's FBD I know that there is the force of the tension acting both vertically (F) and horizontally (Ax). My book draws these forces as I drew them but it also adds another force of the same magnitude as Ax acting to the left. This results in the reaction at A being 1962 N. Where does that force come from?
 

Attachments

  • 20121128_190656.jpg
    20121128_190656.jpg
    26.5 KB · Views: 413
  • #5
wahaj said:
at point C in the BC member's FBD I know that there is the force of the tension acting both vertically (F) and horizontally (Ax). My book draws these forces as I drew them but it also adds another force of the same magnitude as Ax acting to the left.
There is also tension in the AC rod. It happens to come out equal to that in the string because of the dimensions of the rods.
 
  • #6
but doesn't the tension in the rod cancel out as a result of the reaction at A?
 
  • #7
wahaj said:
but doesn't the tension in the rod cancel out as a result of the reaction at A?
Imagine taking away the rod AC. Would the system stay as is? If not, the rod is doing something important.
Allow for a force in the rod in the free body diagram for C and figure out the vertical and horizontal statics equations. You will find a nonzero force there (and as I say, it just happens to equal the string tension with this geometry).
 
  • #8
I see, thanks. its still pretty tough for me to wrap my head around this but your explanation will help.
 

FAQ: Why is the same force drawn twice in the FBD for member AC?

1. What is "same force drawn twice"?

"Same force drawn twice" refers to the concept of applying the same amount of force to an object twice in a row.

2. Does applying the same force twice have a different effect than applying it once?

Yes, applying the same force twice can have a different effect depending on the circumstances. For example, if the object is already in motion, the second application of force may result in a change in direction or speed.

3. Can the same force be drawn twice in different directions?

Yes, the same force can be drawn twice in different directions. This can result in a net force on the object, which will determine its overall motion.

4. Is applying the same force twice considered a continuous force?

No, applying the same force twice is not considered a continuous force. Continuous force refers to a force that is constantly applied without interruption.

5. How does the concept of "same force drawn twice" relate to Newton's Second Law of Motion?

The concept of "same force drawn twice" is related to Newton's Second Law of Motion, which states that the acceleration of an object is directly proportional to the net force applied to it and inversely proportional to its mass. In this case, the same force applied twice may result in a greater acceleration if the mass of the object remains constant.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
1K
Back
Top