Why is the slope of the Fa graph not equal to m in this Atwood machine setup?

  • Thread starter Guru3
  • Start date
  • Tags
    F=ma
In summary, the conversation discussed a physics lab where a cart with weights was pulled by a string over a pulley to verify the equation F=ma graphically. They used 7 different weights and graphed the results with F on the x-axis and a on the y-axis. The issue was that the slope of the graph, which should have been m, was actually half of m. The speaker was seeking clarification on this discrepancy.
  • #1
Guru3
1
0
We've been given a lab in physics class to verify that F=ma graphically. To do this we had a cart with weights on top be pulled by a string with weights on the other end over a pully pull the cart down, bringing weights off the cart to the end of the string to keep the mass constant, but changing the force. Doing this with 7 different weights produced 7 sets which we graphed with F on the x-axis, and a on the y-axis. The problem is the slope of the Fa graph which I would have thought to be m, is aparently half m. Anyone have any idea why? This one is beating me over the head :(. Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
It should be m

what are your caculations (data) read?
 
  • #3


First of all, it's great that you are conducting a lab to verify the relationship between force and acceleration. This is an important concept in physics and it's important to have hands-on experience to fully understand it.

Now, let's address the issue you are facing with the slope of the Fa graph. From your description, it seems like you are using a cart with weights on top being pulled by a string with weights on the other end over a pulley. This setup is known as an Atwood machine and it is commonly used to study the relationship between force and acceleration.

The equation for an Atwood machine is F = (m1 - m2) * a, where m1 is the mass on one side of the pulley, m2 is the mass on the other side, and a is the acceleration of the system. This equation is derived from the second law of motion, F=ma.

However, in your setup, you are keeping the total mass (m1 + m2) constant by transferring weights from the cart to the other end of the string. This means that the mass on one side of the pulley (m1) is changing while the mass on the other side (m2) remains constant. Therefore, the equation for your setup would be F = m1 * a.

Now, let's look at your graph. You have correctly plotted F on the x-axis and a on the y-axis. However, the slope of your graph is not m, it is actually m1. This is because the equation for your setup is F = m1 * a, so the slope of your graph represents the value of m1.

To verify this, you can calculate the slope of your graph by taking two points on the line and using the formula for slope (rise/run). The slope should be equal to the value of m1.

In conclusion, the reason why the slope of your Fa graph is not m is because the equation for your setup is F = m1 * a, where m1 is the changing mass on one side of the pulley. I hope this helps to clarify your confusion. Keep up the good work in your physics class!
 

FAQ: Why is the slope of the Fa graph not equal to m in this Atwood machine setup?

How do you verify F=ma graphically?

To verify F=ma graphically, you will need to plot a graph with acceleration (a) on the y-axis and force (F) on the x-axis. The slope of this graph will represent the mass (m) of the object, as given by the formula F=ma. You can then compare the slope to the actual mass of the object to verify the equation.

What is the purpose of verifying F=ma graphically?

The purpose of verifying F=ma graphically is to ensure that the equation is accurately representing the relationship between force, mass, and acceleration. This allows for a more visual understanding of the concept and can help to identify any discrepancies or errors in the data.

What materials and equipment are needed for verifying F=ma graphically?

You will need a mass scale, a force meter, an object with a known mass, and a smooth surface to conduct the experiment. You may also need a ruler and graphing paper to plot the data.

What are some potential sources of error when verifying F=ma graphically?

Some potential sources of error include friction, air resistance, and human error in measuring and recording the data. To reduce these errors, it is important to conduct the experiment in a controlled environment and to take multiple measurements.

How does verifying F=ma graphically relate to Newton's Second Law of Motion?

Verifying F=ma graphically is a way to visually demonstrate and prove Newton's Second Law of Motion, which states that the acceleration of an object is directly proportional to the net force acting on it and inversely proportional to its mass. The graphical representation of this equation shows how the slope (acceleration) changes as the force and mass are varied.

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
13K
Replies
8
Views
9K
Replies
5
Views
39K
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Back
Top