I Why is this 3D operator with degeneracies only giving me 2 eigenstates

struggling_student
Messages
9
Reaction score
1
The matrix representation of a certain operator in a certain basis is

$$\begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 & 0 \\0 & 0 & -i \\ 0 & i & 0
\end{bmatrix} .$$

The eigenvalue problem leads to this equation

$$0=det\begin{bmatrix} 1-\lambda & 0 & 0 \\0 & -\lambda & -i \\ 0 & i & -\lambda
\end{bmatrix} =-(\lambda-1)^2(\lambda+1).$$

So the eigenvalues are ##1##, ##1## and ##-1##. There is a degenacy and this means that there are two distinct states with the same eigenvalue but I would like to find all the eigenstates, generically denoted as ##\begin{bmatrix} a \\b \\ c \end{bmatrix}##.

First, the non-degenerate ##\lambda=-1## leads to the following equation

$$0=\begin{bmatrix} 2 & 0 & 0 \\0 & 1 & -i \\ 0 & i & 1 \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} a \\b \\ c \end{bmatrix},$$

$$\therefore 2a=0 \ and \ b=ic.$$

So the nondegenerate eigenstate is ##\begin{bmatrix} 0 \\ic \\ c \end{bmatrix}=\begin{bmatrix} 0 \\i \\ 1 \end{bmatrix}## because without the loss of generality we can set ##c:=1##.

Now, for the degerate ##\lambda=1## the equation is

$$0=\begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 & 0 \\0 & -1 & -i \\ 0 & i & -1 \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} a \\b \\ c \end{bmatrix},$$

##\therefore b=-ic##, any value for ##a## will do so the degerate state is ##\begin{bmatrix} a \\-ic \\ c \end{bmatrix}##. How do I interpret this?

I expected to find two different vectors but instead I've got a two-parameter result. What is the degerate state? Is what I wrote not a valid operator? Am I mistaken in thinking that a degerate eigenvalue corresponds to exactly two distinct eigenstates?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you put in two different values for ##a## you get two linearly independent vectors.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and struggling_student
Your result makes sense. The eigenvector calculation needs to give you all the vectors in the subspace (two dimensional here) with the degenerate eigenvalue. However, if you want to have a set of orthogonal vectors, then after you pick the first value of ##a## you determine the second vector by enforcing orthogonality.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and struggling_student
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...
Thread 'Lesser Green's function'
The lesser Green's function is defined as: $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\langle C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\rangle=i\bra{n}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\ket{n}$$ where ##\ket{n}## is the many particle ground state. $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{n}e^{iHt'}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(0)e^{-iHt'}e^{iHt}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$ First consider the case t <t' Define, $$\ket{\alpha}=e^{-iH(t'-t)}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$ $$\ket{\beta}=C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt'}\ket{n}$$ $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{\beta}\ket{\alpha}$$ ##\ket{\alpha}##...
Back
Top