- #1
bartieshaw
- 50
- 0
Hey
First off, my terminology in the title may not be correct or what others use because when searching the forums for "polynomial ring" i had a lot of trouble finding anything that matched what i meant when i coined the term...
By polynomial ring i mean, for some ring R the polynomial ring over R is the ring R[x] = {a_0 + a_1x + ... + a_nx^n + ... ; a_i is in R} under the operations (+, .)
Now to my Question -
In the case that R (as above) is a Field, F, the i understand that F[x] is an integral domain, but not a field because of the simple example that my lecturers love to throw about, x in F[x] does not have an inverse (is not a unit)
Now i understand this argument and i don't dispute it, but i was wondering if any of you could tell me, or at least start me off (as it would probably help my understanding) on how to show / prove that x has no inverse in F[x]...
I have thought about this...but I am not sure the following argument is correct
suppose there was g(x) st. xg(x)=1
then xg(x)=x^0
hence g(x) = x^(0-1) = x^-1 which is not polynomial and hence not in F[x]
im thinking maybe a better argument would involve how i started but then somehow using the fact F[x] has no zero divisors would be more correct...but this is just guess work really.
sorry for the long post
cheers
Bart
First off, my terminology in the title may not be correct or what others use because when searching the forums for "polynomial ring" i had a lot of trouble finding anything that matched what i meant when i coined the term...
By polynomial ring i mean, for some ring R the polynomial ring over R is the ring R[x] = {a_0 + a_1x + ... + a_nx^n + ... ; a_i is in R} under the operations (+, .)
Now to my Question -
In the case that R (as above) is a Field, F, the i understand that F[x] is an integral domain, but not a field because of the simple example that my lecturers love to throw about, x in F[x] does not have an inverse (is not a unit)
Now i understand this argument and i don't dispute it, but i was wondering if any of you could tell me, or at least start me off (as it would probably help my understanding) on how to show / prove that x has no inverse in F[x]...
I have thought about this...but I am not sure the following argument is correct
suppose there was g(x) st. xg(x)=1
then xg(x)=x^0
hence g(x) = x^(0-1) = x^-1 which is not polynomial and hence not in F[x]
im thinking maybe a better argument would involve how i started but then somehow using the fact F[x] has no zero divisors would be more correct...but this is just guess work really.
sorry for the long post
cheers
Bart