Why is x^p - a irreducible over a field of characteristic p?

In summary, if K is a field of characteristic p, and there exists an element a \in K which is not a pth power, then I am told we can show x^p - a is an irreducible polynomial (and since it is not separable our field is imperfect).
  • #1
imurme8
46
0
If [itex]K[/itex] is a field of characteristic [itex]p[/itex], and there exists an element [itex]a \in K[/itex]
which is not a [itex]p[/itex]th power (i.e. the Frobenius endomorphism is not
surjective), then I am told we can show [itex]x^p - a[/itex] is an irreducible polynomial
(and since it is not separable our field is imperfect). I see that
[itex]x^p - a[/itex] has no roots in [itex]K[/itex], but how do we know that there does not exist
any factorization of [itex]x^p -a[/itex] into factors of lesser degree?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Hint: Let [itex]f(x) = x^p - a[/itex], let F be a splitting field for f and let [itex]\alpha[/itex] be a root of f(x) in F. Can you take it from there?
 
Last edited:
  • #3
OK, how about this? Over [itex]F[/itex] we have [itex]\alpha[/itex] as the only root of [itex]f(x)[/itex] (with multiplicity [itex]p[/itex]). Let [itex]f(x)=p_1(x)\dotsb p_n(x)[/itex] be a factorization of [itex]f(x)[/itex] in [itex]K[x][/itex] into monic irreducibles. Then each of these must be the minimal polynomial of [itex]\alpha[/itex] over [itex]K[/itex]. So they all must have the same degree. So the degree of [itex]p_1(x)=\dotsb=p_n(x)[/itex] divides [itex]p[/itex], so it is either 1 or [itex]p[/itex]. But it cannot be 1, so it must be [itex]p[/itex], so [itex]f(x)[/itex] itself is irreducible.

Is that what you would suggest? I don't see an easier way to show [itex](x-\alpha)^m\notin K[x][/itex] for all positive integers [itex]m<p[/itex].
 
  • #4
Your argument looks OK. Here's what I had in mind: We have that [itex]f(x) = (x - \alpha)^p = x^p - \alpha^p[/itex] and so [itex]a = \alpha^p[/itex]. Suppose that f(x) = g(x)h(x) is a proper, non-trivial factorization of f(x) over K. Then, by unique factorization, [itex]g(x) = (x - \alpha)^s[/itex], for some 0 < s < p. The constant term of g(x) is [itex]\alpha^s[/itex], so [itex]\alpha^s \in K[/itex]. Since gcd(s, p) = 1, there exist integers m and n such that sm + pn = 1. Therefore, [itex]\alpha = \alpha^{sm+pn} = (\alpha^s)^m (\alpha^p)^n[/itex] is an element of K. But [itex]a = \alpha^p[/itex], contradicting the assumption that a is not a pth power in K. Therefore, no such factorization of f(x) exists.
 
  • Like
Likes Warren Leywon
  • #5
I like your way, very elegant. Thanks for the help!
 

FAQ: Why is x^p - a irreducible over a field of characteristic p?

Why is x^p - a irreducible over a field of characteristic p?

This is because in a field of characteristic p, x^p - a is equivalent to (x-a)^p, which has no linear factors. Therefore, it cannot be factored into smaller irreducible polynomials over this field.

2. Can x^p - a be factored over a field of characteristic p if a is not a pth power?

No, x^p - a cannot be factored over a field of characteristic p if a is not a pth power. This is because the only irreducible factors of x^p - a would be of the form (x-b)^p, which means b would have to be a pth power in order for the factor to be irreducible. If a is not a pth power, then there would be no possible factors and x^p - a would remain irreducible.

3. What is the significance of the characteristic p in determining the irreducibility of x^p - a?

The characteristic p of a field is the smallest positive integer such that p multiplied by any element in the field results in 0. In a field of characteristic p, x^p - a is equivalent to (x-a)^p, which has no linear factors. This means that the characteristic p plays a crucial role in determining the irreducibility of x^p - a over a field.

4. Can x^p - a be reducible over a field of characteristic p if p is not a prime number?

Yes, x^p - a can be reducible over a field of characteristic p even if p is not a prime number. For example, if p is a composite number such as 4, then x^4 - a can be factored into (x^2 - a)(x^2 + a), which means it is reducible over a field of characteristic 4.

5. How does the characteristic p of a field affect the roots of x^p - a?

In a field of characteristic p, the roots of x^p - a are always pth roots of a. This is because in such a field, x^p - a is equivalent to (x-a)^p, which means any root of x^p - a would also be a root of (x-a)^p. Therefore, the characteristic p determines the nature of the roots of x^p - a in a field of characteristic p.

Back
Top