Why my answer is wrong? - remove electron from orbital

In summary, the electron configuration of nickel is [Ar] 4s2, 3d8. The 4s electrons fill before the 3d electrons and the 3d subshell is part of the n=3 energy level. This will be discussed in your textbook.
  • #1
zhen
48
0
why my answer is wrong? --- remove electron from orbital

question:
In forming Ni+ and Ni2+, the nickel atom loses electrons from which orbital(s)?

I looked at the periodic tale, and Ni is in the middle, where the 3d orbital located. so when you need to remove one or two electrons, you should remove from the 3d orbital. but that is not right?

the answer for that is 4s instead of 3d orbital. i don't get it. the 3d should have higher energy than 4s, so how can you remove the 4s, but not 3d first?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
G"day, Zhen.

As the names indicate, 4s electrons are one energy level higher than the 3d electrons. The 4s electrons are furthest from the nucleus (and have lower energy levels shielding) so require the least amount of energy to remove.
 
  • #4
Unco said:
G"day, Zhen.
As the names indicate, 4s electrons are one energy level higher than the 3d electrons. The 4s electrons are furthest from the nucleus (and have lower energy levels shielding) so require the least amount of energy to remove.

But the electron configuration of Ni is [Ar] 4s2, 3d8, shouldn't you remove the electron from the 3d8 first? Even though youn sounds right, I still have a little confusion.
 
  • #6
zhen said:
But the electron configuration of Ni is [Ar] 4s2, 3d8, shouldn't you remove the electron from the 3d8 first? Even though youn sounds right, I still have a little confusion.
We write it [Ar] 3d8 4s2
(albeit with superscripts)

The d orbitals are "late fillers". By "fill" I refer to the number of electrons increasing as you go across the periodic table.

Look at your periodic table:
Ca doesn't have any 3d electrons but has two 4s electrons. It's not until you get to Sc that an electron fills the 3d subshell.

So in that sense, the 4s electrons fill before the 3d electrons. But the 3d subshell is part of the n=3 energy level, and is "below" the 4s subshell.

This most certainly will be discussed in your textbook.

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

General question (I'm new): is there a way to prevent formatting (ie. line breaks) from disappearing upon previewing?
 
  • #7
thanks very much, i am really appriciated.
 

FAQ: Why my answer is wrong? - remove electron from orbital

Why is my answer wrong even though I removed an electron from the orbital?

Removing an electron from an orbital is a complex process and there are many factors that can affect the accuracy of your answer. It is possible that you made a mistake in your calculations, or there could be other electrons in the same orbital that are also affecting the energy levels.

Can removing an electron from an orbital change the overall charge of the atom?

Yes, removing an electron from an orbital can change the overall charge of the atom. If an electron is removed from a negatively charged orbital, the overall charge of the atom will become more positive. Similarly, removing an electron from a positively charged orbital will make the atom more negative.

How does removing an electron from an orbital affect the atom's chemical properties?

Removing an electron from an orbital can significantly affect the atom's chemical properties. The number of electrons in an atom's outermost shell, also known as the valence electrons, determines the atom's chemical behavior. Removing an electron can change the number of valence electrons and therefore alter the atom's reactivity and ability to form chemical bonds.

Is it possible to remove multiple electrons from an orbital?

Yes, it is possible to remove multiple electrons from an orbital. The number of electrons that can be removed depends on the specific orbital and the energy levels of the electrons. However, removing multiple electrons can significantly alter the atom's properties and stability.

Can removing an electron from an orbital lead to the formation of ions?

Yes, removing an electron from an orbital can lead to the formation of ions. Ions are atoms that have gained or lost electrons, resulting in a non-neutral charge. Removing an electron can create an ion with a positive charge, while gaining an electron can result in an ion with a negative charge.

Similar threads

Back
Top