- #1
Langbein
- 209
- 0
Should humans have a moral ?
If they should, what should then be the nature and content of this moral ?
Would it be some advantage to be without a moral ?
If there should be a moral, in which circumstanses or in which environment should this be applicable ?
If moral is about doing or practicing some kind of "rules" when and in which situation will these rules be valid ?
Will they be valid in a family ? What about in a country ? What about between coutries ?
Should it be possible to say something like "I have one moral that I use in my family and the neares group around me while when it comes to politics and things like that, it should be an other set of rules that has nothing to do with my daily life moral."
As an exsample could the question about how the natural resources are chered between nations be a question about morality ?
Could it be bether and more practical just to say that there should be no moral at all ?
If they should, what should then be the nature and content of this moral ?
Would it be some advantage to be without a moral ?
If there should be a moral, in which circumstanses or in which environment should this be applicable ?
If moral is about doing or practicing some kind of "rules" when and in which situation will these rules be valid ?
Will they be valid in a family ? What about in a country ? What about between coutries ?
Should it be possible to say something like "I have one moral that I use in my family and the neares group around me while when it comes to politics and things like that, it should be an other set of rules that has nothing to do with my daily life moral."
As an exsample could the question about how the natural resources are chered between nations be a question about morality ?
Could it be bether and more practical just to say that there should be no moral at all ?