- #1
mahmoud2011
- 88
- 0
Why the definition of limit is often written in this form also it can be more easy ?
in Real numbers and Real Analysis by Ethan.D.Bloch : writes the definition :
let I[itex]\subseteq [/itex]ℝ be an open interval ,c [itex]\in[/itex]I , let f:I-{c} → ℝ be a function and let L[itex]\in[/itex]ℝ , L is the limit of f as x goes to c ,
if for any ε>0 , there exists δ>0 such that x [itex]\in[/itex] I-{c} and |x-c| < δ imply |f(x)-L| < ε
some questions concerned here , why he don't write instead of the Bold part this simply
0<|x-c| < δ imply |f(x)-L| < ε
in the first definition does the inequality mean that there is some x satisfy it such that x [itex]\notin[/itex] I ?
in Real numbers and Real Analysis by Ethan.D.Bloch : writes the definition :
let I[itex]\subseteq [/itex]ℝ be an open interval ,c [itex]\in[/itex]I , let f:I-{c} → ℝ be a function and let L[itex]\in[/itex]ℝ , L is the limit of f as x goes to c ,
if for any ε>0 , there exists δ>0 such that x [itex]\in[/itex] I-{c} and |x-c| < δ imply |f(x)-L| < ε
some questions concerned here , why he don't write instead of the Bold part this simply
0<|x-c| < δ imply |f(x)-L| < ε
in the first definition does the inequality mean that there is some x satisfy it such that x [itex]\notin[/itex] I ?
Last edited: