A Why the James Webb Space Telescope needs propellant

AI Thread Summary
Orbits around Lagrange points, such as L2, are inherently unstable and require periodic trajectory adjustments to maintain. The James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) is not scheduled for refueling, meaning it will drift away from L2 once its propellant is depleted. Simulations indicate that without propulsion, the JWST could end up in a wide Earth orbit, potentially becoming unsynchronized with the Moon's orbit. The influence of the Sun and other planets complicates these orbital patterns. Ultimately, the JWST's fate after losing propellant remains uncertain, but it may settle into a resonant orbit similar to that of Jupiter's moons.
James Demers
Messages
75
Reaction score
44
TL;DR Summary
The orbit of the JWST around its Lagrange point is unstable, and has to be tweaked if the telescope is to remain on station. What happens when the propellant runs out?
Orbits around the Lagrange point are not stable, and you need to tweak your trajectory every now and then to remain in that orbit. Simulations of a non-accelerated body give spectacularly weird results:

When the propellant runs out, is this what the JWST will do?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I assume this includes only Earth's and Moon's gravity. The Sun and other planets will probably mess those nice periodic patterns up.
 
It is not scheduled for refuel, so when its propellant runs out, it will drift out of the L2 point and find its own orbit.

Someone has run a simulation:
https://space.stackexchange.com/que...falls-off-the-l2-or-l1-point-where-will-it-go

Their conclusion, which I cannot vouch for, suggests that it may end up in a wide Earth orbit, beyond the Moon (IOW, still orbiting Earth but no longer synced to the Moon's revolution). I'm just guessing here but I imagine it might end up in a resonant orbit with the Moon (like Jupiter's Galilean satellites)
 
Last edited:
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Scalar and vector potentials in Coulomb gauge Assume Coulomb gauge so that $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=0.\tag{1}$$ The scalar potential ##\phi## is described by Poisson's equation $$\nabla^2 \phi = -\frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}\tag{2}$$ which has the instantaneous general solution given by $$\phi(\mathbf{r},t)=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\int \frac{\rho(\mathbf{r}',t)}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}d^3r'.\tag{3}$$ In Coulomb gauge the vector potential ##\mathbf{A}## is given by...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
Back
Top