- #36
Studiot
- 5,440
- 9
This is not really an answer to your question, which floats on the boundaries between science, mathematics and philosophy, it is some things for you to think about.
When we talk about a physical property or quantity we look for a mathematical model. We want the mathematical rules to reflect the physical ones (and vice versa) as far as practicable. I don't say as far a possible because there is rarely if ever a total match.
Often we use the real numbers.
So what interesting properties do the real numbers come with?
Well, apart from the obvious arithmetic ones they are well ordered. This is a mathematical statement of the fact that we can place them one after another in order. This affords us the concept of greater than or less than. It also implies that every number has its place and cannot be placed somewhere else on the number line.
Next comes the property of completedness. This is a mathematical way of saying that there are no gaps or numbers not included between the numbers on the number line.
Is this always a good correspondence to physics theory in the light of quantum mechanics? Is time quantised?
Then the reals posess a distance function. This guarantees us that the difference (distance) between say 5 and 7 is the same as the distance between say 5000 and 5002.
This feature can be very useful but does it fit with more complicated (relativistic) theories of space-time? It does however provide the ruler you guys were talking about and suggests that 1 metre or 1 second on Mars the the same as 1 metre or 1 second on Alpha Centauri.
Some physical properties obey rules not reflected in the reals so we introduce imaginary numbers - at the cost of the well ordering principle as complex numbers are not well ordered and cannot be put in greater than less than order.
When we talk about a physical property or quantity we look for a mathematical model. We want the mathematical rules to reflect the physical ones (and vice versa) as far as practicable. I don't say as far a possible because there is rarely if ever a total match.
Often we use the real numbers.
So what interesting properties do the real numbers come with?
Well, apart from the obvious arithmetic ones they are well ordered. This is a mathematical statement of the fact that we can place them one after another in order. This affords us the concept of greater than or less than. It also implies that every number has its place and cannot be placed somewhere else on the number line.
Next comes the property of completedness. This is a mathematical way of saying that there are no gaps or numbers not included between the numbers on the number line.
Is this always a good correspondence to physics theory in the light of quantum mechanics? Is time quantised?
Then the reals posess a distance function. This guarantees us that the difference (distance) between say 5 and 7 is the same as the distance between say 5000 and 5002.
This feature can be very useful but does it fit with more complicated (relativistic) theories of space-time? It does however provide the ruler you guys were talking about and suggests that 1 metre or 1 second on Mars the the same as 1 metre or 1 second on Alpha Centauri.
Some physical properties obey rules not reflected in the reals so we introduce imaginary numbers - at the cost of the well ordering principle as complex numbers are not well ordered and cannot be put in greater than less than order.
Last edited: