Wick rotation and interference

In summary: You Wick rotate the Schroedinger equation and its complex conjugate, and you get a diffusion equation. You then have to choose a time-symmetric ordering for the derivatives in the diffusion equation. One choice (the one I understand the least) is to choose the so-called "Moyal" ordering. This leads to diffusion processes in the complex plane, which in turn lead to complex-valued amplitudes for transition probabilities. When you calculate the expectation value of the transition probability amplitude, you have to integrate over all time variables in the complex plane, but there is a contour integral you can do which makes the integral "simply" converge. This is the analogue of the oscillatory integral that I was talking about in my other post. I
  • #1
causalset
73
0
In light of the fact that Wick rotation can replace imaginary exponent wtih the real one, how does it reproduce interference? For example, in double slit experiment, how would we reproduce the fact that probability of reaching certain spots on the screen is zero? After all, the exponent of something "real" is always positive, so there is no room for cancelation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
causalset said:
In light of the fact that Wick rotation can replace imaginary exponent wtih the real one, how does it reproduce interference? For example, in double slit experiment, how would we reproduce the fact that probability of reaching certain spots on the screen is zero? After all, the exponent of something "real" is always positive, so there is no room for cancelation.

The replacement is only valid for certain kinds of calculations, namely when you can undo the Wick rotation at the end of your calculation to get back a result in Minkowski space.
Then the oscillatory nature reappears.
 
  • #3
Don't worry about the rotation will kill the imaginary part...Though the action S in the exponent seems become "real",but the integral interval of time shifts from real zone into imaginary zone, which will guarantee that the amplitude still is complex value instead of a pure real number...Hence,the distribution of the pole in the complex plane will not change after the Wick rotation and it will give the same results.
Wick rotation is just more like a math skill...so a math skill won't offer any new physical facts but give a fresh viewpoint of the equation..
 
  • #4
Causalset,

Wick rotating the Schroedinger equation and its complex conjugate leads to a theoretical framework called Euclidean Quantum Mechanics, developed by Jean-Claude Zambrini. In this framework, one can have a linear superposition of transition probability solutions to the Wick rotated Schroedinger equations, and hence have interference of transition probabilities. See these papers:

Stochastic mechanics according to E. Schrödinger
Phys. Rev. A 33, 1532–1548 (1986)
http://pra.aps.org/abstract/PRA/v33/i3/p1532_1

Euclidean quantum mechanics
Phys. Rev. A 35, 3631–3649 (1987)
http://pra.aps.org/abstract/PRA/v35/i9/p3631_1

The first paper explicitly gives the formula (equation 4.13, section C) for the interference of transition probabilities under two-slit boundary conditions.
 
Last edited:
  • #5
A. Neumaier said:
The replacement is only valid for certain kinds of calculations, namely when you can undo the Wick rotation at the end of your calculation to get back a result in Minkowski space.
Then the oscillatory nature reappears.

This doesn't answer the OP's question. The Wick rotation is perfectly valid for wavefunctions used to describe two-slit interference. See the papers I cited.
 
  • #7
Maaneli said:
This doesn't answer the OP's question. The Wick rotation is perfectly valid for wavefunctions used to describe two-slit interference. See the papers I cited.

But how do you transform equation 4.13, section C back to Minkowski space and recover the interference pattern? Zambrini is apparently silent about this!
 
  • #8
A. Neumaier said:
But how do you transform equation 4.13, section C back to Minkowski space and recover the interference pattern? Zambrini is apparently silent about this!

This is a different question, and it doesn't invalidate the answer to the OP's question.

Also, Zambrini does actually show how one can transform between the Euclidean and real-time diffusions (the real-time diffusions also properly describe two-slit interference). What one has to do is change the time-symmetric ordering of the stochastic derivatives in the definition of the mean acceleration.
 
  • #9
Maaneli said:
This is a different question, and it doesn't invalidate the answer to the OP's question.

The question was:
''how would we reproduce the fact that probability of reaching certain spots on the screen is zero? After all, the exponent of something "real" is always positive, so there is no room for cancellation.''
and therefore requires an answer for how you can get back the Minkowski result from the Euclidean calculation. Zambrini is of no help here, it seems.
 
  • #10
A. Neumaier said:
The question was:
''how would we reproduce the fact that probability of reaching certain spots on the screen is zero? After all, the exponent of something "real" is always positive, so there is no room for cancellation.''

I'm point out to the OP that Zambrini shows that, contrary to his assumption that there is no room for cancellation, there is in fact an interference of transition probabilities in the Euclidean case.

A. Neumaier said:
and therefore requires an answer for how you can get back the Minkowski result from the Euclidean calculation. Zambrini is of no help here, it seems.

No. Once again, his question is about how one would reproduce the prediction of interference in the context of a Wick rotated version of QM. If you read the Zambrini paper, you'll see how this is done.
 

FAQ: Wick rotation and interference

What is Wick rotation and how does it relate to interference?

Wick rotation is a mathematical technique used in theoretical physics to simplify calculations involving time-dependent systems. It involves rotating the time variable in the equations from real to imaginary values. This technique is often used in the study of interference phenomena, such as in quantum field theory, to make the calculations more manageable.

Why is Wick rotation necessary for studying interference?

Interference phenomena involve the interaction of waves, which are described using complex numbers. By rotating the time variable to imaginary values, the equations become easier to solve as the complex numbers can be expressed as real numbers. This simplification allows for a better understanding of the underlying physics of interference.

How does Wick rotation affect the physical interpretation of interference?

Wick rotation does not change the physical interpretation of interference. It is simply a mathematical technique used to simplify calculations. The results obtained after using Wick rotation can be transformed back to real time to obtain the physical quantities of interest.

Are there any limitations or drawbacks to using Wick rotation?

While Wick rotation is a useful tool in theoretical physics, it does have some limitations. It only applies to time-dependent systems and may not work for all types of interference phenomena. Additionally, the results obtained after using Wick rotation may not always be physically meaningful and must be carefully interpreted.

Can Wick rotation be used in other areas of science besides interference?

Yes, Wick rotation is a general mathematical technique that can be applied in various fields of science, such as quantum mechanics, statistical mechanics, and general relativity. It is particularly useful in systems with time-dependent behavior, making it applicable in a wide range of scientific studies.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
889
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
64
Views
4K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
1K
Replies
19
Views
2K
Back
Top